Characterization of bacterial fucokinase/GDP-fucose pyrophosphorylase (FKP) enzymes supports the evolution of interdomain communication and modularity in the FKP family
Nicholas T. SmithiD, Autumn J. HodginsiD, Marie E. BoddingtoniD, Chantelle J. CapicciottiiD, George Colin diCenzoiD, Graeme W. HoweiD
Abstract
L-fucokinase (FUK) and GDP-fucose pyrophosphorylase (GFPP) salvage free L-fucose and synthesize the valuable nucleotide-sugar GDP-L-fucose (GDP-Fuc). Some organisms express these enzymes as one bifunctional polypeptide called L-fucokinase/GDP-fucose pyrophosphorylase (FKP), which has attracted attention for use in the chemoenzymatic synthesis of GDP-Fuc. Despite the documented use of the FKP from Bacteroides fragilis (BfFKP), the evolutionary origins of these enzymes and their relationships to monofunctional FUKs and GFPPs are poorly understood. We hypothesized that biochemical characterization of these proteins coupled with an evolutionary analysis would uncover the natural diversity of FKPs, facilitating the discovery of new biocatalysts. Phylogenetic and sequence similarity network (SSN) analyses distinguished FKPs from FUKs and GFPPs, suggesting that FKPs originate from one ancestral fusion event between these domains. To evaluate how environmental factors might select for functional diversity within the FKP family, we recombinantly expressed and purified a putative FKP from the thermophilic bacterium Thermophagus xiamenensis (TxFKP). This enzyme exhibited in vitro kinase and pyrophosphorylase activities and demonstrated subtle kinetic differences compared to BfFKP. While alanine scanning mutational analysis of the TxFKP FUK and GFPP domains supported the role of conserved residues that TxFKP uses to coordinate substrate binding and catalysis, other mutations in the TxFKP GFPP domain influenced kinase activity differentially for the substrates L-fucose and D-arabinose, showing an unprecedented role for the GFPP domain in FUK substrate specificity. Finally, thermal shift profiles of TxFKP and BfFKP were biphasic and provided new insights into how these enzymes have evolved to respond to different sugar substrates.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Conformational Diversity and Substrate Specificity are Decoupled in Ancestral and Extant Glucokinases
Carolin Freye, Brian G. Miller·bioRxiv·May 11, 2026
- New Structure of Class II Fructose-1,6-Bisphosphatase from Francisella tularensis suggest a novel catalytic mechanism for the entire class
C. Abad-Zapatero, A. I. Selezneva, … F. Movahedzadeh·bioRxiv·Sep 5, 2022
- Ancestral protein reconstruction reveals the mechanism of substrate specificity in FN3K-mediated deglycation.
Jenet K. Matlack, Robert E Miner, … Jennifer M. Binning·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 3, 2026
- Structures of Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus phosphoglucose isomerase reveal novel rigidity in the active site of a selected subset of enzymes upon substrate binding.
R. W. Meek, I. T. Cadby, A. L. Lovering·bioRxiv·Mar 26, 2021
- Two marine GH29 α-L-fucosidases from an uncultured Paraglaciecola sp. specifically hydrolyze fucosyl-N-acetylglucosamine regioisomers
M. Schultz-Johansen, P. Stougaard, … D. Teze·bioRxiv·Jun 1, 2021
- The evolutionary processes of bacterial aromatic polyketide ketosynthases
X Wang, Qiandi Gao, … Zhiwei Qin·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 25, 2026