Genetic Mapping of All Human Paralog Pairs to Characterize Synthetic Lethality and Buffering
Michael J. FlisteriD, Daniel VerduzcoiD, Sakina M. Petiwala, Tatiana Carneiro-Lobo, Christos GekasiD, Xu ShiiD, Charles LuiD, Zoltán DezsőiD
Abstract
Paralogs are abundant in the human genome and thought to be a primary source of synthetic lethality, yet the vast paralogome remains largely uncharacterized. A digenic screen of all paralogous gene pairs in the human genome revealed that synthetic lethalities were infrequent and varied in penetrance in different tumor backgrounds. We hypothesized that the variable penetrance of synthetic lethalities resulted from complex polygenic interactions with different cellular contexts. A machine learning classifier of a subset of paralog pairs tested across 49 cancer models revealed that endogenous perturbations in related pathways predicted paralog synthetic lethality. Further, predictive modeling of paralog synthetic lethality revealed that the strength of synthetic lethal interactions were largely due to the overlap and essentiality of the protein-protein interaction networks shared by the paralogs pairs. Collectively, this study tested all digenic paralog interactions and delineated the key feature classes that underlie the heterogeneity of paralog synthetic lethalities. HighlightsO_LISynthetic lethal paralogs have long been known, yet most paralog interactions are untested. C_LIO_LIWe report the first combinatorial screen of all 36,648 known human paralog pairs. C_LIO_LIA meta-analysis of 461 paralog pairs in 49 cell models revealed context-dependent interactions. C_LIO_LIThe essentiality of paralog interaction networks dictate the strength of synthetic lethality. C_LI eTOCSynthetic lethal paralogs have long been known, yet most paralog interactions are untested. Flister et al report a screen of all 36,648 known human paralog pairs. These data combined with a meta-analysis of 461 pairs across 49 cell models revealed insights to the molecular underpinnings of context-dependent synthetic lethality. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=195 SRC="FIGDIR/small/603642v3_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (61K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1356ac3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f43108org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@bf2a26org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6844f8_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.48
- Field percentile
- top 42%
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comprehensive prediction of robust synthetic lethality between paralog pairs in cancer cell lines
Barbara De Kegel, Niall Quinn, … Colm J. Ryan·Cell SystemsPeer-reviewed·Sep 15, 2021
- A predicted cancer dependency map for paralog pairs
Narod Kebabci, Hamda B. Ajmal, … Colm J. Ryan·bioRxiv·Jan 19, 2026
- Discovery of synthetic lethal and tumor suppressive paralog pairs in the human genome
Phoebe C. R. Parrish, James D. Thomas, … Alice H. Berger·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2021
- Optimal methods for analyzing targeted pairwise knockout screens
Juihsuan Chou, Nazanin Esmaeili Anvar, … Traver Hart·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2024
- Paralog buffering contributes to the variable essentiality of genes in cancer cell lines
Barbara De Kegel, Colm J. Ryan·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 25, 2019
- Predicting resistance to synthetic lethal therapies in cancer
Metin Yazar, Christopher J. Lord, Colm J. Ryan·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2026