henhaobio
Sign in

International Journal of Biological MacromoleculesSynthetic BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

Direct RNA Oxford Nanopore sequencing distinguishes between modifications in tRNA at the U34 position

Wiktor KuśmirekiD, Natalia Strozynska, Paula Martin-Arroyo Cerpa, Agnieszka DziergowskaiD, Grażyna LeszczyńskaiD, Robert Marek NowakiD, Małgorzata AdamczykiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

The measurement of tRNA modifications with single transcript resolution has been feasible for only a few modifications due to the lack of available methods. This limitation does not allow to advance basic research studies on the dynamic nature of tRNA modification and its cellular function in time and space, neither to develop modern diagnostic tools for several already known tRNA-dependent human diseases. Nanopore is a well-established sequencing method that has proven to be efficient for the study of RNA. The analysis of tRNA modifications by Nanopore is still under development. We have investigated the efficacy of nanopore technology to discriminate between complex modifications of uridine 34 in tRNA, which affect the base-calling properties of neighbouring bases and are therefore difficult to accurately predict. We have developed new methods to chemically and enzymatically synthesise single modified tRNA molecules with modifications at the anticodon loop. Nanopore technology captures the features produced by uridine with and without a thiol group when present on synthetic tRNA molecules. Thus, Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) has great potential for developing strategies to accurately identify the modification status of the tRNA anticodon loop (ACL), which encompasses the most complex modifications on uridine-containing RNA motifs. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=69 SRC="FIGDIR/small/630739v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (14K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4317baorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@caf204org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d7249dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a4f8c8_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Citations
5
FWCI
1.49
Field percentile
top 19%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWhite '24Esfahani '26White '25Piechotta '26Léger '21Stephenson '22
81% semantic matchMolecular Biology
Laura K. White, Kezia Dobson, Samantha del Pozo+10 more·bioRxiv·Jul 23, 2024· 28 citations