Evaluation of Nanopore direct RNA sequencing updates for modification detection
Neda Ghohabi EsfahaniiD, Andrew J. SteiniD, Stuart AkesoniD, Talia TzadikarioiD, Connor PowelliD, Pooria Daneshvar KakhakiiD, Miten JainiD
Abstract
Nanopore technology can directly sequence intact RNA molecules, offering a unique capability to read native modifications. Oxford Nanopore Technologies recently updated its direct RNA sequencing technology from RNA002 to RNA004 chemistry. This update included an improved basecaller (Dorado) for increased sequencing accuracy, and ionic current models for de novo detection of four RNA modifications. Using a single RNA extraction from GM12878 B-lymphocyte cell line, we compared RNA002 and RNA004 sequencing chemistries and evaluated Dorado modification calling accuracy. We computed U-to-C mismatches, previously used to identify putative pseudouridine sites, and ran m6anet for identifying putative N6-methyladenosine sites. Dorado results for each respective modification showed both global and site-specific differences when compared to RNA002 results. We used DRS data from in vitro transcription of GM12878 genomic DNA as well as synthetic oligonucleotides to evaluate Dorado modification calling performance. Dorados pseudouridine model achieved 96-98% for both accuracy and F1-score. Similarly, Dorados N6-methyladenosine model achieved 94-98% accuracy, 96-99% F1-score. Our results demonstrate that Nanopore Direct RNA sequencing could simultaneously detect pseudouridine, N6-methyladenosine, 5-methylcytosine, and inosine modifications on individual mRNA strands. It is critical to validate these calls using orthogonal methods (e.g., Liquid Chromatography with Tandem Mass Spectrometry) for increased confidence. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=81 SRC="FIGDIR/small/651717v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (25K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1215534org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@160f38forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@164a9corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17c72e5_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 12.26
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Comparative Evaluation of Computational Models for RNA modification detection using Nanopore sequencing with RNA004 Chemistry
Yongji Zou, Mian Umair Ahsan, … Kai Wang·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2025
- Enhanced detection of RNA modifications and mappability with high-accuracy nanopore RNA basecalling models
Gregor Diensthuber, Leszek P. Pryszcz, … Eva Maria Novoa·bioRxiv·Nov 28, 2023
- Systematic benchmarking of basecalling models for RNA modification detection with highly multiplexed nanopore sequencing
Gregor Diensthuber, Ivan Milenkovic, … Eva Maria Novoa·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Apr 7, 2026
- RNA modifications detection by comparative Nanopore direct RNA sequencing
Adrien Léger, Paulo Amaral, … Tony Kouzarides·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Dec 10, 2021
- Evaluation of Dorado v5.2.0 de novo basecalling models for the detection of tRNA modifications using RNA004 chemistry
Bhargesh Indravadan Patel, Franziskus Hauth, … Ann E. Ehrenhofer‐Murray·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jun 29, 2026
- Integrating mass spectrometry with Nanopore direct RNA sequencing for de novo modification profiling of bacteriophage MS2
Joshua D. Jones, Neda Ghohabi Esfahani, … Kristin S. Koutmou·bioRxiv·Jun 2, 2026