Development of the Follow-Up Discourse Observation Protocol (FUDOP) for characterizing instructor active-learning follow-up behaviors
Xinjian CeniD, Maci Kight, Rachel LeeiD, Petra KranzfelderiD, Stanley M. LoiD, Jeffrey P. MaloyiD, Melinda T. OwensiD
Abstract
Instructors can provide feedback to their class in multiple ways. One way is through their follow-up behaviors, which are the specific strategies instructors implement after active learning activities. These behaviors could play an important role in student learning as students can receive feedback from the instructor. However, there is little research on the effects of different types of follow-up behaviors. Follow-up after active learning can be seen as a form of discourse between the instructor and the entire class. Previous researchers developed the Classroom Discourse Observation Protocol (CDOP) to analyze discourse between the instructor and individual students or small groups. We used CDOP as a starting point to develop and validate a new protocol, the Follow-Up Discourse Observation Protocol (FUDOP), to characterize instructional follow-up behaviors to the entire class after active-learning activities. We then used FUDOP to characterize follow-up behaviors of multiple instructors in introductory biology courses at three different universities. We measured consistent differences in these behaviors across instructors but not within instructors, demonstrating that instructors may engage in consistent follow-up behaviors. FUDOP could allow instructors and researchers to better measure and analyze follow-up behaviors and their effects, which could in turn provide guidance to instructors and faculty developers.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Field percentile
- top 11%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Could instructor talk drive CURE effectiveness? A comparative study of instructor talk in introductory lab courses
Christopher James Zajic, Kelly Subramanian, … Erin L. Dolan·CBE—Life Sciences EducationPeer-reviewed·Jan 13, 2026
- Effect of time spent on active learning on exam performance: A controlled case study on a course with different instructors but identical teaching materials
X. Cen, R. J. Lee, … M. T. Owens·bioRxiv·Sep 1, 2022
- Are they funny? Associations between instructors humor and student emotions in undergraduate lab courses
Zarae A. Allen, Christopher James Zajic, … Trevor T. Tuma·Journal of Microbiology and Biology EducationPeer-reviewed·Nov 7, 2025
- Breakout Rooms, Polling, and Chat, Oh My! The Development and Validation of Online COPUS
T. S. Pusey, A. P. Valencia, … P. Kranzfelder·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2021
- Influence of non-content instructor talk on students' motivation-related outcomes in laboratory courses
Christopher James Zajic, Erin L. Dolan·bioRxiv·May 15, 2026
- Longitudinal study of persistence in professional development outcomes of early career biology faculty
N. C. Emery, J. M. Maher, D. Ebert-May·bioRxiv·Oct 5, 2019