A multi-institutional study to investigate the sparing effect after whole brain electron FLASH in mice: Reproducibility and temporal evolution of functional, electrophysiological, and neurogenic endpoints
Olivia G.G. DraysoniD, Stavros MelemenidisiD, Nikita KatilaiD, Vignesh ViswanathaniD, Enikö A. KramáriD, Richard ZhangiD, Rachel Y. KimiD, Ning RuiD, Benoît PetitiD, Suparna DuttiD, Rakesh ManjappaiD, Muhammad Ramish AshrafiD, Brianna C. LauiD, Luis Antonio Cruz SotoiD, Lawrie Basil SkinneriD, Amu S. Yu, Murat SürücüiD, Peter G. MaximiD, Paola Ballesteros‐ZebadúaiD, Marcelo A. WoodiD, Pierre Montay‐GrueliD, Janet E. BaulchiD, Marie‐Catherine VozeniniD, Billy W. LooiD, Charles L. LimoliiD
Abstract
PurposeUltra-high dose-rate radiotherapy (FLASH) has been shown to mitigate normal tissue toxicities associated with conventional dose rate radiotherapy (CONV) without compromising tumor killing in preclinical models. A prominent challenge in preclinical radiation research, including FLASH, is validating both the physical dosimetry and the biological effects across multiple institutions. MethodsWe previously demonstrated dosimetric reproducibility of two different electron FLASH devices at separate institutions using standardized phantoms and dosimeters. In this study, we compared the outcome of FLASH and CONV 10 Gy whole brain irradiation on female adult mice at both institutions to evaluate the reproducibility and temporal evolution of multiple endpoints. ResultsFLASH sparing of behavioral performance on novel object recognition (4 months post-irradiation) and electrophysiologic long-term potentiation (LTP, 5-months post-irradiation) was reproduced between institutions. Interestingly, differences between FLASH and CONV on the endpoints of hippocampal neurogenesis (Sox2, doublecortin), neuroinflammation (microglial activation), and electrophysiology (LTP) at late times were not observed at early times. ConclusionsIn summary, we demonstrated reproducible FLASH sparing effects between two beams and two institutions with validated dosimetry. FLASH sparing effects on the endpoints evaluated manifested at late but not early time points.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 25
- FWCI
- 5.05
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Dosimetric and biologic intercomparison between electron and proton FLASH beams
A. Almeida, M. Togno, … M.-c. Vozenin·bioRxiv·Apr 20, 2023
- Investigating Rat-Brain Normal Tissue and Tumor FLASH Effects with a Novel Very High Energy Electron Beam
Tyler V. Kay, Anna L. Price, … Mark Oldham·bioRxiv·Sep 5, 2025
- Differentiating unirradiated mice from those exposed to conventional or FLASH radiotherapy using MRI
Jeannette Jansen, Adam Kimbler, … Paola Ballesteros‐Zebadúa·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2025
- Proton FLASH preserves neurocognition across delivery techniques: implications for clinical translation in pediatric brain tumors
Devin Miles, Daniel Sforza, … Sahaja Acharya·bioRxiv·Jun 2, 2026
- Ultra-High Dose Rate Helium Ion Beams: Minimizing Brain Tissue Damage while Preserving Tumor Control
Ivana Đokić, Mahmoud Moustafa, … Amir Abdollahi·Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 31, 2024
- Differential and regionally distinct molecular responses distinguish FLASH and conventional RT in a medulloblastoma model while preserving therapeutic outcomes
Michèle Knol, Javier Franco‐Pérez, … Paola Ballesteros‐Zebadúa·bioRxiv·Nov 1, 2026