Distribution of 54 polygenic risk scores for common diseases in long lived individuals and their offspring

Abstract

A surprising and well-replicated result in genetic studies of human longevity is that centenarians appear to carry disease-associated variants in numbers similar to the general population. With the proliferation of large genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in recent years, investigators have turned to polygenic scores to leverage GWAS results into a measure of genetic risk that can better predict risk of disease than individual significant variants alone. We selected 54 polygenic risk scores (PRSs) developed for a variety of outcomes and we calculated their values in individuals from the New England Centenarian Study (NECS, N = 4886) and the Long Life Family Study (LLFS, N = 4577). We compared the distribution of these PRSs among exceptionally long-lived individuals (ELLI), their offspring and controls and we also examined their predictive values, using t-tests and regression models adjusting for sex and principal components reflecting ancestral background of the individuals (PCs). In our analyses we controlled for multiple testing using a Bonferroni-adjusted threshold for 54 traits. We found that only 4 of the 54 PRSs differed between ELLIs and controls in both cohorts. ELLIs had significantly lower mean PRSs for Alzheimers disease (AD), coronary artery disease (CAD) and systemic lupus than controls, suggesting genetic predisposition to extreme longevity may be mediated by reduced susceptibility to these traits. ELLIs also had significantly higher mean PRSs for improved cognitive function. In addition, the PRS for AD was associated with higher risk of dementia among controls but not ELLIs (p = 0.0004, 0.3 in NECS, p = 0.03, 0.93 in LLFS respectively). Interestingly, ELLIs did not have a larger number of homozygous risk genotypes for AD (TNECS = -1.72, TLLFs = 0.83) and CAD (TNECS = -5.08, TLLFs = -0.31) in both cohorts, but did have significantly larger number of homozygous protective genotypes than controls for the two traits (AD: TNECS =3.10, TLLFs = 2.2, CAD: TNECS = 6.57, TLLFs =2.36, respectively). ELLIs have a similar burden of genetic disease risk as the general population for most traits, but have significantly lower genetic risk of AD, CAD, and lupus. The lack of association between AD PRS and dementia among ELLIs suggests that their genetic risk for AD is somehow buffered by protective genetic or environmental factors.