Communications BiologyCell BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Supervised and unsupervised deep learning-based approaches for studying DNA replication spatiotemporal dynamics
Koy Chong Ng Kee KwongiD, Ben PhilpsiD, F. N. C. Smith, Aleksandra Sobieska, Naiming CheniD, Constance AlabertiD, Hakan BileniD, Sara B.C. BuonomoiD
Abstract
In eukaryotic cells, DNA replication is organised both spatially and temporally, as evidenced by the stage-specific spatial distribution of replication foci in the nucleus. Despite the genetic association of aberrant DNA replication with numerous human diseases, the labour-intensive methods employed to study DNA replication have hindered large-scale analyses of its roles in pathological processes. In this study, we first demonstrate that a convolutional neural network trained to classify S-phase stages based on DAPI and EdU patterns could identify altered replication dynamics in Rif1-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), revealing a skewed distribution across the various S-phase stages. Given the possible practical limitations associated with a supervised framework, we proceed to show that the abnormal replication profile of Rif1-deficient mESCs could further be detected by an unsupervised approach (based on self-supervised representation learning), which could additionally reconstruct progression through S-phase. Finally, we extend our approach to a well-characterised cellular model of inducible deregulated origin firing, involving cyclin E overexpression. Through parallel EdU- and PCNA-based analyses, we demonstrate the potential applicability of our method to patient samples, offering a means to identify the contribution of deregulated DNA replication to a plethora of pathogenic processes.
- organism: mouse
- assay: fluorescence / live-cell microscopy
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: trajectory inference
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: deep learning
- approach: contrastive learning
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.32
- Field percentile
- 44th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- ecDNA replication is disorganised and vulnerable to replication stress
Jedrzej J Jaworski, Pauline Luise Pfuderer, … Julian E. Sale·bioRxiv·Mar 22, 2025
- RF-SIRF defining reversed DNA replication forks with single-cell and spatio-temporal resolution reveals a replication stress specific epigenetic code
Sunetra Roy, Morgan Fimreite, … Katharina Schlacher·bioRxiv·Apr 21, 2025
- Spatial mapping of DNA synthesis reveals dynamics and geometry of human replication nanostructures
Michael Hawgood, Bruno Urién, … Bennie B. L. G. Lemmens·The EMBO JournalPeer-reviewed·Oct 7, 2025
- Model-based inference of cell cycle dynamics captures alterations of the DNA replication programme
Adolfo Alsina, Marco Fumasoni, Pablo Sartori·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 14, 2025
- RepliCNN: High-resolution inference of the DNA replication program from strand-specific 3' DNA end sequencing
Dominik Stroh, Nicola Zilio, … Kathi Zarnack·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2026
- Space-time dynamics of genome replication studied with super-resolved microscopy
Márton Gelléri, Michael Sterr, … Marion Cremer·bioRxiv·Mar 22, 2024