Cohesin-mediated 3D contacts tune enhancer-promoter regulation
Philine GuckelbergeriD, Benjamin R. DoughtyiD, Glen Munson, Suhas S.P. RaoiD, Yingxuan TaniD, Xiangmeng Shawn CaiiD, Charles P. FulcoiD, Joseph NasseriD, Kristy S. MualimiD, Drew T. BergmaniD, Judhajeet RayiD, Evelyn Jagoda, Chad J. MungeriD, Andreas R. GschwindiD, Maya U. ShethiD, Anthony S. Tan, Saul Godinez PulidoiD, Namita MitraiD, David WeisziD, Muhammad S. ShamimiD, Neva C. DurandiD, Ragini MahajaniD, Ruqayya KhaniD, Lars Michael SteinmetziD, Masato T. KanemakiiD, , J EngreitziD
Abstract
Enhancers are key drivers of gene regulation thought to act via 3D physical interactions with the promoters of their target genes. However, genome-wide depletions of architectural proteins such as cohesin result in only limited changes in gene expression, despite a loss of contact domains and loops. Consequently, the role of cohesin and 3D contacts in enhancer function remains debated. Here, we developed CRISPRi of regulatory elements upon degron operation (CRUDO), a novel approach to measure how changes in contact frequency impact enhancer effects on target genes by perturbing enhancers with CRISPRi and measuring gene expression in the presence or absence of cohesin. We systematically perturbed all 1,039 candidate enhancers near five cohesin-dependent genes and identified 34 enhancer-gene regulatory interactions. Of 26 regulatory interactions with sufficient statistical power to evaluate cohesin dependence, 18 show cohesin-dependent effects. A decrease in enhancer-promoter contact frequency upon removal of cohesin is frequently accompanied by a decrease in the regulatory effect of the enhancer on gene expression, consistent with a contact-based model for enhancer function. However, changes in contact frequency and regulatory effects on gene expression vary as a function of distance, with distal enhancers (e.g., >50Kb) experiencing much larger changes than proximal ones (e.g., <50Kb). Because most enhancers are located close to their target genes, these observations can explain how only a small subset of genes -- those with strong distal enhancers -- are sensitive to cohesin. Together, our results illuminate how 3D contacts, influenced by both cohesin and genomic distance, tune enhancer effects on gene expression.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 33
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Building regulatory landscapes: enhancer recruits cohesin to create contact domains, engage CTCF sites and activate distant genes
Niels J. Rinzema, Konstantinos Sofiadis, … Wouter L. de Laat·bioRxiv·Oct 5, 2021
- The Mediator complex regulates enhancer-promoter interactions
Shyam Ramasamy, Abrar Aljahani, … A. Marieke Oudelaar·Nature Structural & Molecular BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2023
- Cohesin is required for long-range enhancer action
Lauren Kane, Iain Williamson, … Wendy A. Bickmore·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2021
- Synergy between cis-regulatory elements can render cohesin dispensable for distal enhancer function
Karissa L. Hansen, Annie S. Adachi, … Elphège Pierre Nora·bioRxiv·Oct 4, 2024
- Cohesin-dependent and independent mechanisms support chromosomal contacts between promoters and enhancers
Michiel J. Thiecke, Gordana Wutz, … Mikhail Spivakov·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2020
- Cohesin bridging as a physical principle of enhancer-promoter communication
Timothy Földes, Karissa L. Hansen, … Leonid A. Mirny·bioRxiv·May 9, 2026