Mechanical evolution of 3T3 fibroblastic cells exposed to nanovibrational stimulation
Olivia Johnson-LoveiD, Francisco M. EspinosaiD, Jaime R. TejedoriD, Gioele Gorgone, Paul CampsieiD, Matthew John DalbyiD, S. Reid, Ricardo Garcia, Peter G. ChildsiD
Abstract
Cells are mechanosensitive, responding to external mechanical stimulation. Nanovibrational stimulation has been shown to enhance cell contractility and actin stress fibre formation. These changes in morphology occur quickly, alongside associated mechanical changes. Here, the relationship between acute morphological and mechanical changes in NIH 3T3 fibroblastic cells in response to nanovibrational stimulation is presented. A 1 kHz, 30 nm vibration is applied continuously for 72 hours. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) quantifies mechanical properties of the nucleus and cytoplasm at multiple timepoints, while immunofluorescence tracks morphological changes. Within 3 hours of stimulation, both nuclear and cytoplasmic stiffness increase significantly, accompanied by a decrease in the cellular fluid exponent, suggesting a shift of the cell towards more solid-like behaviour. These changes correlate with increased nuclear area. Actin polymerisation also increases within 24 hours, although variably. To understand the role of the cytoskeleton, actin polymerisation and contraction are inhibited using cytochalasin D and blebbistatin. Results show that inhibition prevents stiffness increases and results in a higher fluid exponent, indicating a more fluid-like state. These findings demonstrate that actin-myosin dynamics mediate cell stiffening under nanovibrational stimulation. Interestingly, prolonged stimulation appears to reverse this effect, suggesting that temporal optimisation of stimulation may enhance long-term mechanotransducive responses.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Matrix Softening Controls Stretch-Induced Cellular Memory and Fibroblast Activation
Y. Hong, X. Peng, … F. Alisafaei·bioRxiv·Oct 12, 2022
- Nanovibrational stimulation of osteogenesis engages non-canonical Wnt signalling and NF-κB regulator BCL3 as a mechanotransducer
Hussain Jaffery, Udesh Dhawan, … Matthew John Dalby·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2025
- Stress fiber growth and remodeling determines cellular morphomechanics under uniaxial cyclic stretch
A. Chatterjee, P. Kondaiah, N. Gundiah·bioRxiv·Apr 29, 2019
- Isolated Nuclei Stiffen in Response to Low Intensity Vibration
J. K. Newberg, J. Schimpf, … G. Uzer·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2020
- TENSCell: A 3D-Printed Device for High-Magnification Imaging of Stretch-Activated Cells Reveals Divergent Nuclear Behavior to Different Levels of Strain
B. Seelbinder, A. Scott, … C. Neu·bioRxiv·Nov 7, 2019
- Effects of substrate stiffness and actin velocity on fibronectin fibril morphometry and mechanics
S. H. Weinberg, N. Saini, C. Lemmon·bioRxiv·Feb 24, 2021