Nature GeneticsGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
Joint genotypic and phenotypic outcome modeling improves base editing variant effect quantification
Jayoung RyuiD, Sam Barkal, Tian Yu, Martin JankowiakiD, Yunzhuo ZhouiD, Matthew FrancoeuriD, Quang Vinh PhaniD, Zhijian LiiD, Manuel TognoniD, Lara Brown, Michael I. LoveiD, Vineel BhatiD, Guillaume LettreiD, David Benjamin AscheriD, Christopher A. CassaiD, Richard I. SherwoodiD, Luca PinelloiD
Abstract
CRISPR base editing screens are powerful tools for studying disease-associated variants at scale. However, the efficiency and precision of base editing perturbations vary, confounding the assessment of variant-induced phenotypic effects. Here, we provide an integrated pipeline that improves the estimation of variant impact in base editing screens. We perform high-throughput ABE8e-SpRY base editing screens with an integrated reporter construct to measure the editing efficiency and outcomes of each gRNA alongside their phenotypic consequences. We introduce BEAN, a Bayesian network that accounts for per-guide editing outcomes and target site chromatin accessibility to estimate variant impacts. We show this pipeline attains superior performance compared to existing tools in variant classification and effect size quantification. We use BEAN to pinpoint common variants that alter LDL uptake, implicating novel genes. Additionally, through saturation base editing of LDLR, we enable accurate quantitative prediction of the effects of missense variants on LDL-C levels, which aligns with measurements in UK Biobank individuals, and identify structural mechanisms underlying variant pathogenicity. This work provides a widely applicable approach to improve the power of base editor screens for disease-associated variant characterization.
- organism: human
- assay: CRISPR screen
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: Bayesian inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 32
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Field percentile
- top 4%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- BEstimate: a computational tool for the design and interpretation of CRISPR base editing experiments
Cansu Dinçer, Bo Fussing, … Matthew A. Coelho·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 27, 2026
- Massively parallel assessment of human variants with base editor screens
Ruth E. Hanna, Mudra Hegde, … John G. Doench·CellPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2021
- A comprehensive benchmark for multiple highly efficient base editors with broad targeting scope
Xiao‐Feng Wang, Xiaolong Cheng, … Fei Teng·bioRxiv·Dec 17, 2024
- Precise in vivo functional analysis of DNA variants with base editing using ACEofBASEs target prediction
Alex Cornean, Jakob Gierten, … Joachim Wittbrodt·eLifePeer-reviewed·Apr 4, 2022
- A side-by-side comparison of variant function measurements using deep mutational scanning and base editing
Ivan Sokirniy, Haider Inam, … Justin R. Pritchard·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jul 19, 2025
- LDLR variant classification through activity-normalized prime editing screening
Phillip J. Zhou, Minja Velimirovic, … Richard I. Sherwood·CirculationPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2026