Nature CommunicationsImmunologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Immunologic and Biophysical Features of the BNT162b2 JN.1- and KP.2-Adapted COVID-19 Vaccines
Wei J. CheniD, Kristin R. TompkinsiD, Ian W. WindsoriD, Lyndsey T. MartineziD, Minah Ramos, Weiqiang LiiD, Shikha ShrivastavaiD, Swati Rajput, Jeanne S. ChangiD, Parag V. SahasrabudheiD, Kimberly F. FennelliD, Thomas J. McLellan, Graham M. WestiD, Kristianne P. Dizon, Aaron Yam, Siddartha Mitra, Subrata Saha, Daiana Sharaf, Andrew P. McKeen, Carla Iris Cadima Couto, Alexander MuikiD, Wesley Swanson, Raquel Munoz Moreno, Pilar Mendoza Daroca, Uğur ŞahiniD, , Kayvon ModjarradiD
Abstract
Vaccines remain a vital public health tool to reduce the burden of COVID-19. COVID-19 vaccines that are more closely matched to circulating SARS-CoV-2 lineages elicit more potent and relevant immune responses that translate to improved real-world vaccine effectiveness. The rise in prevalence of the Omicron JN.1 lineage, and subsequent derivative sublineages such as KP.2 and KP.3, coincided with reduced neutralizing activity and effectiveness of Omicron XBB.1.5-adapted vaccines. Here, we characterized the biophysical and immunologic attributes of BNT162b2 JN.1- and KP.2-adapted mRNA vaccine-encoded spike (S) protein immunogens. Biophysical interrogations of S revealed the structural consequences of hallmark amino acid substitutions and a potential molecular mechanism of immune escape employed by JN.1 and KP.2. The vaccine candidates were evaluated for their immunogenicity when administered as fourth or fifth doses in BNT162b2-experienced mice or as a primary series in naive mice. In both vaccine-experienced and naive settings, JN.1- and KP.2-adapted vaccines conferred improved neutralizing responses over the BNT162b2 XBB.1.5 vaccine against a broad panel of emerging JN.1 sublineages, including the predominant KP.3.1.1 and emerging XEC lineages. Antigenic mapping of neutralizing responses indicated greater antigenic overlap of JN.1- and KP.2-adapted vaccine responses with currently circulating sublineages compared to an XBB.1.5-adapted vaccine. CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were generally conserved across all three vaccines. Together, the data support the selection of JN.1- or KP.2-adapted vaccines for the 2024-25 COVID-19 vaccine formula. ONE-SENTENCE SUMMARYThe Omicron JN.1- and KP.2-adapted BNT162b2 mRNA vaccines encoding prefusion S proteins elicit similar preclinical neutralizing antibody responses against circulating JN.1 sublineage pseudoviruses that are more potent than those elicited by past iterations of BNT162b2 licensed vaccines, thus demonstrating the importance of annual strain changes to the COVID-19 vaccine.
- organism: mouse
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 8.68
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Preclinical Characterization of the Omicron XBB.1.5-Adapted BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccine
K. Modjarrad, Y. Che, … K. Swanson·bioRxiv·Nov 17, 2023
- Preclinical immunogenicity of the LP.8.1-adapted BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine
Chaitanya Kurhade, Wei J. Chen, … Kayvon Modjarrad·npj VaccinesPeer-reviewed·Jul 6, 2026
- mRNA-1273 vaccines adapted to JN.1 or KP.2 elicit cross-neutralizing responses against the JN.1 sublineages of SARS-CoV-2 in mice
Diana Wing Lee, Arshan Nasir, … Yadunanda Budigi·VaccinePeer-reviewed·Mar 7, 2025
- Immunological imprinting shapes the cross-reactive antibody responses to the KP.2 and LP.8.1 vaccine doses
Sanjeev Kumar, Lilin Lai, … Mehul S. Suthar·Journal of VirologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 26, 2026
- Neutralizing antibody evasion of SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 derivatives KP.3, KP.3.1.1, LB.1, and XEC
Kaori Sano, Kei Miyakawa, … Hideki Hasegawa·VaccinePeer-reviewed·Nov 5, 2024
- Omicron BA.2 breakthrough infection enhances cross-neutralization of BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/BA.5