FLASH Bragg-peak irradiation with a therapeutic carbon ion beam: first in vivo results
Walter TinganelliiD, Anggraeini Puspitasari-KokkoiD, Olga SokoliD, Alexander HelmiD, Palma SimonielloiD, Christoph SchuyiD, Sylvie LerchliD, Denise EckertiD, Julius Oppermann, Anna RehmiD, Stefan JansseniD, Denise Engel, Ralf MoelleriD, Rossana Romano, Felix HorstiD, Daria BoscoloiD, Claudia FournieriD, Marco DuranteiD, Uli Andreas WeberiD
Abstract
Background and purposeIn recent years, ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) irradiation has emerged as a promising innovative approach to cancer treatment. Characteristic feature of this regimen, commonly referred to as FLASH effect, demonstrated primarily for electrons, photons or protons, is the improved normal tissue sparing, while the tumor control is similar to the one of the conventional dose-rate (CDR) treatments. The FLASH mechanism is, however, unknown. One major question is whether this effect is maintained when using densely ionizing (high-LET) heavy nuclei. Materials and MethodsHere we report the effects of 20 Gy UHDR heavy ion irradiation in clinically relevant conditions, i.e., at high-LET in the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) of a 12C beam using an osteosarcoma mouse model. ResultsWe show that UHDR irradiation was less toxic in the normal tissue compared to CDR while maintaining tumor control. The immune activation was also comparable in UHDR and CDR groups. We observed that the gut microbiome was altered in mice injected with the tumor compared to healthy animals, but both UHDR and CDR exposures steered the metagenome toward a balanced state. ConclusionsThe results show that the FLASH effect is safe and effective in heavy ion therapy and provide an important benchmark for the current mechanistic FLASH models. Highlights- FLASH irradiation with SOBP carbon ions spares normal tissue in mouse - Tumor control, immune response, and gut microbioma changes are induced at the same extent both at conventional and ultra-high dose rate - FLASH carbon ion irradiation is a safe and effective alternative to conventional radiotherapy.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 26
- FWCI
- 7.11
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- First demonstration of the FLASH effect with ultrahigh dose-rate high-energy X-rays
- Ultra-High Dose Rate Helium Ion Beams: Minimizing Brain Tissue Damage while Preserving Tumor Control
Ivana Đokić, Mahmoud Moustafa, … Amir Abdollahi·Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 31, 2024
- Investigating Rat-Brain Normal Tissue and Tumor FLASH Effects with a Novel Very High Energy Electron Beam
Tyler V. Kay, Anna L. Price, … Mark Oldham·bioRxiv·Sep 5, 2025
- Effectiveness of FLASH vs conventional dose rate radiotherapy in a model of orthotopic, murine breast cancer
Stavros Melemenidis, Vignesh Viswanathan, … Frederick M. Dirbas·CancersPeer-reviewed·Mar 25, 2025
- Redefining FLASH RT: the impact of mean dose rate and dose per pulse in the gastrointestinal tract
Kevin Liu, Trey Waldrop, … Emil Schüler·International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*PhysicsPeer-reviewed·Apr 23, 2024
- Exploring High LET Oxygen-Ion FLASH Radiation for Targeting Pancreatic Cancer in Vitro and In Vivo
Celine Karle, Domenico Ivan Filosa, … Ivana Đokić·Physics and Imaging in Radiation OncologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2025