Differential Variant Calling In Mutants From Diverse Genetic Backgrounds: A Case Study In The Nematode Pristionchus pacificus
Abstract
Genome sequencing of mutants is one of the most widely used techniques to identify genes that control traits of interest including human diseases. Traditionally, variants are called against reference genomes and various filtering techniques are applied to reduce the number of candidate mutations. However, if the genetic background of the mutant is different from the reference genome, the number of background variants may exceed the number of true mutations by several orders of magnitude resulting in candidate lists that cannot be effectively reduced.\n\nWe introduce the problem of differential variant calling in mutants from diverse genetic backgrounds. In the example of a mutant strain of the nematode Pristionchus pacificus, where the genetic background is not identical to the reference genome ({approx}1% genome-wide divergence), we show that simple intersection filtering does not effectively reduce the list of candidate mutations due to the combined effect of high number of background mutations, missing coverage in the wildtype sample, and problematic regions in the genome assembly. Although restriction to sites with coverage in mutant and wildtype sample greatly reduced the number of candidate sites, we further improved this candidate set by implementing a customized variant calling procedure. This takes the mutant sample and the control sample of same genetic background as input and calls variants exhibiting strong discriminative signals across the two samples. Intersecting the candidate mutations with an interval identfied from mapping by RAD-seq revealed a likely splice-site mutation in the P. pacificus dpy-1 gene, which has been previously shown to cause the associated morphological phenotype.\n\nOur study shows that combined analysis of mutant and wildtype samples drastically increases the potential to find true mutations. We hope that these results may be helpful for other model systems, where the identification of candidate mutants is complicated by assembly errors, lab-derived mutations, or different genetic backgrounds.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A simplified workflow for the analysis of whole-genome sequencing data from Pristionchus pacificus mutant lines
Christian Rödelsperger·bioRxiv·Nov 12, 2020
- A method of identifying false positives in the strain-specific variant calling of rice
Sun‐Hee Kim, Sang‐Ho Chu, … Chang-Yong Lee·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2023
- Cleaning clinical genomic data: Simple identification and removal of recurrently miscalled variants in single genomes
Matthew A. Field, Gaétan Burgio, … T. Daniel Andrews·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2017
- Improved Mutation Detection in Duplex Sequencing Data with Sample-Specific Error Profiles
Yuhe Cheng, Shuvro Prokash Nandi, … Ludmil B. Alexandrov·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2025
- Benchmarking Genomic Variant Calling Tools in Inbred Mouse Strains: Recommendations and Considerations
Alexis Garretson, Laura Blanco-Berdugo, … Beth L. Dumont·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 3, 2026
- Easy-to-use whole-genome sequencing workflows and standardized practices to uncover hidden genetic variation in Synechocystis PCC 6803 wild-type and knock-out strains
Marius L. Theune, Ruben Fritsche, … Kirstin Gutekunst·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2026