Molecular Biology and EvolutionGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Regulatory plasticity of the human genome
Abstract
Evolutionary turnover in non-coding regions has driven phenotypic divergence during past speciation events and continues to facilitate environmental adaptation through variants. We used a deep learning model to identify the substrates of regulatory turnover using genome wide mutations mimicking three evolutionary pathways: recent history (human-chimp substitutions), modern population (human population variation), and mutational susceptibility (random mutations). We observed enhancer turnover in approximately 6% of the whole genome, with more than 80% of the novel activity arising from repurposing of enhancers between cell-types. Frequency of turnover in a cell-type is remarkably similar across the three pathways, despite only [~]19% overlap in the source regions. The enhancers predisposed to turnover display reduced evolutionary constraints and are depleted in GWAS variants. Most of these occur within 100kb of a gene, with the highest turnover occurring near neurodevelopmental genes including CNTNAP2, NPAS3, and AUTS2. Flanking enhancers of these genes undergo high turnover irrespective of the mutational model pathway, suggesting a high plasticity in neurocognitive evolution. Based on susceptibility to random mutations, these enhancers were identified as vulnerable by nature and feature a higher abundance of cell type-specific transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs). Our findings suggest that enhancer repurposing within vulnerable loci drives regulatory innovation while keeping the core regulatory networks intact.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: deep learning
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Field percentile
- 43th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- CpG island turnover events predict evolutionary changes in enhancer activity
Acadia A. Kocher, Emily V. Dutrow, … James P. Noonan·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 13, 2024
- Massively parallel discovery of human-specific substitutions that alter neurodevelopmental enhancer activity
Severin Uebbing, Jake Gockley, … James P. Noonan·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Dec 28, 2020
- Emergence of new enhancers at late DNA replicating regions
Paola Cornejo‐Páramo, Veronika Petrova, … Emily S. W. Wong·bioRxiv·Dec 22, 2022
- Modeling the evolutionary architectures of human enhancer sequences reveals distinct origins, functions, and associations with human-trait variation
S. L. Fong, J. A. Capra·bioRxiv·Aug 3, 2020
- Reconstructing human gene regulatory evolution using deep learning
Tetsuya Yamada, Xuefei Yuan, … Henrik Kaessmann·bioRxiv·Oct 31, 2026
- Pleiotropic enhancers are ubiquitous regulatory elements in the human genome
Ian Laiker, Nicolás Frankel·Genome Biology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·May 10, 2022