Host Cell Wall Polysaccharides Modulate Nanosynbacteria Recognition and Attachment
Alex S. GrossmaniD, João Gabriel Silva SouzaiD, Lei LeiiD, Kamilla Anochchenko, Mengying XiaiD, Yaxi WangiD, Jean‐Lou ReyreiD, Elisabeth C. LoweiD, Xuesong HeiD, Patrick Joseph MoynihaniD, Joseph D. MougousiD, Batbileg BoriD
Abstract
Ultrasmall episymbiotic bacteria grow on the surface of their obligate bacterial hosts. These episymbionts have a restricted host range and likely rely on host-derived receptor molecules to identify and associate with cognate hosts. Nanosynbacteria from the oral microbiome, like Nanosynbacter lyticus, utilize a pair of distinct type 4 pili (T4P) for host surface interactions, T4P-1 and T4P-2. In this study we identify the adhesin components of both T4P, demonstrate that these adhesins localize to the cell wall of the cognate host Actinobacterium Schaalia odontolytica, and demonstrate that each adhesin binds distinct components of the host cell wall. The adhesin from the motility driving T4P-1, termed PilX1, showed a wide range of affinities in microarray screening and bound peptidoglycan directly, but could not bind purified cell wall polysaccharides (CWPS) from host surfaces. Conversely, the adhesin from T4P-2, termed PilX2, bound host-derived CWPS and preferentially bound episymbiont-naive hosts over episymbiont-exposed hosts. Within the bacterial host we identified two CWPS biosynthesis pathways that altered adhesin binding and episymbiont susceptibility. Disruption of a rhamnose-CWPS pathway left hosts susceptible to episymbiont binding and disruption of a fucose remodeling pathway made hosts more resistant to episymbiont binding. Analyzing polysaccharide compositions revealed multiple CWPS, potentially including a rhamnose- and mannose-rich rhamnomannan. Consistent with this finding, exogenously added rhamnose and mannose were able to block binding by N. lyticus, supporting a role for these sugars in episymbiont defense. Our study reveals that Nanosynbacteria rely on the complex sugars that coat their host bacteria for recognition and attachment.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Saccharibacteria deploy two distinct Type IV pili, driving episymbiosis, host competition, and twitching motility
Alex S. Grossman, Lei Lei, … Batbileg Bor·The ISME JournalPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Episymbiotic Saccharibacteria suppresses epithelial immunoactivation through Type IV pili and TLR2 dependent endocytosis
Deepak Chouhan, Alex S. Grossman, … Batbileg Bor·bioRxiv·May 30, 2025
- Transcriptome of epibiont Saccharibacteria Nanosynbacter lyticus strain TM7x during establishment of symbiosis
E. L. Hendrickson, B. Batbileg, … J. S. McLean·bioRxiv·Mar 25, 2022
- Episymbiotic bacterium induces intracellular lipid droplet production in its host bacteria
P.-T. Dong, J. Tian, … X. He·bioRxiv·Sep 6, 2023
- Oral Actinobacteria sense and defend against parasitic epibionts
Yaxi Wang, Jake Colautti, … Joseph D. Mougous·bioRxiv·Sep 9, 2026
- The membrane microenvironment regulates the sequential attachment of bacteria to host cells.
X. Pierrat, J. P. H. Wong, … A. Persat·bioRxiv·Nov 25, 2020