medRxivGenetic & Genomic MedicinePreprint
Genetic structure of major depression symptoms across clinical and community cohorts
Mark J. AdamsiD, Jackson G. ThorpiD, Bradley S. JermyiD, Alex S. F. KwongiD, Kadri KõiviD, Andrew David GrotzingeriD, Michel Guillaume NivardiD, Sally MarshalliD, Yuri MilaneschiiD, Bernhard Theodor BauneiD, Bertram Müller‐MyhsokiD, Brenda W.J.H. PenninxiD, Dorret Irene BoomsmaiD, Douglas F. LevinsoniD, Gerome D. BreeniD, Giorgio PistisiD, Hans Jörgen GrabeiD, Henning W. TiemeieriD, Klaus BergeriD, Marcella RietscheliD, Patrik K. E. MagnussoniD, Rudolf UheriD, Steven P. HamiltoniD, Susanne LucaeiD, Kelli LehtoiD, , Eske M. DerksiD
Abstract
Diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder allow for heterogeneous symptom profiles but genetic analysis of major depressive symptoms has the potential to identify clinical and aetiological subtypes. There are several challenges to integrating symptom data from genetically-informative cohorts, such as sample size differences between clinical and community cohorts and various patterns of missing data. We conducted genome-wide association studies of major depressive symptoms in three clinical cohorts that were enriched for affected participants (Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Australian Genetics of Depression Study, Generation Scotland) and three community cohorts (Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, Estonian Biobank, and UK Biobank). We fit a series of confirmatory factor models with factors that accounted for how symptom data was sampled and then compared alternative models with different symptom factors. The best fitting model had a distinct factor for Appetite/Weight symptoms and an additional measurement factor that accounted for missing data patterns in the community cohorts (use of Depression and Anhedonia as gating symptoms). The results show the importance of assessing the directionality of symptoms (such as hypersomnia versus insomnia) and of accounting for study and measurement design when meta-analysing genetic association data.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 4
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Whats in a diagnosis? A genetic decomposition of major depression.
Bradley S. Jermy, Kylie P. Glanville, … Evangelos Vassos·Molecular PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Jul 21, 2021
- Investigating Genetic Heterogeneity in Major Depression Through Item-level Genetic Analyses of the PHQ-9
Jackson G. Thorp, Andries T. Marees, … Eske M. Derks·Psychological MedicinePeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2019
- Atypical energy-related symptoms define biologically distinct subtypes of major depressive disorder
Arvid Harder, Rujia Wang, … Yi Lu·medRxiv·Jul 4, 2026
- Minimal phenotyping yields GWAS hits of reduced specificity for major depression
Na Cai, Joana A. Revez, … Jonathan Flint C·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2019
- Genome-wide association analyses identify 44 risk variants and refine the genetic architecture of major depression
eQTLGen, Naomi R. Wray, … Niamh Mullins·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 26, 2018
- Genome-Wide Meta-Analyses Of Stratified Depression In Generation Scotland And UK Biobank
Lynsey S. Hall, Mark J. Adams, … Andrew Mark McIntosh·Translational PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Jan 9, 2018