henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint

Model-based evaluation of Targeted-Antibacterial-Plasmids (TAPs) transfer kinetics and resensitization of pOXA-48 carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli

Sophie MarolleauiD, Jérémy MoreauiD, Julien M. BuyckiD, Sarah BigotiD, Christian LesterliniD, Nicolas GrégoireiD, Vincent Aranzana‐ClimentiD

PDFDOI

Abstract

Background Targeted-Antibacterial Plasmids (TAPs) are engineered mobile genetic elements that use bacterial conjugation to deliver selective CRISPR/Cas9 antibacterial activity against a specific target strain. Yet, the efficiency of TAPs is typically evaluated at a single time point, whereas the success of TAP-mediated resensitization critically depends on the dynamics of plasmid transfer and the complex interactions between bacterial subpopulations. This is the first study to evaluate the efficiency of a conjugation-based antibacterial approach at the subpopulation level, using an analytical framework analogous to that used for conventional antibiotics. Here, we investigate which process limits resensitization by TAPF-dCas9-OXA48: plasmid delivery, dCas9 activity, or the emergence of refractory and escape populations. Methods We fitted a mechanistic model of five interacting subpopulations (donors, recipients, transconjugants, escapers, and recusants) to 44 longitudinal conjugation experiments and used the fitted model to explore a range of biologically relevant scenarios. Results Using longitudinal conjugation data spanning 24 h, we show that up to 24% of recipients become recusants within 24h, refractory to further conjugation via entry exclusion, while secondary transconjugant emergence stays below 0.01%. Overall resensitization efficiency reaches up to 80%. Conclusion Plasmid transfer, rather than dCas9 repression, therefore appears to be the main bottleneck limiting the efficiency of TAPF-dCas9-OXA48 efficiency. These results identify plasmid delivery as a key engineering target for improving the performance of future TAPs.

Citations
0

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.