Sign in
Systems BiologyPLoS Biology
Peer-reviewed journal article

Non-latching positive feedback enables robust bimodality by de-coupling expression noise from the mean

Brandon S. RazookyiD, Youfang CaoiD, Maike M. K. HanseniD, Alan S. PerelsoniD, Michael L. SimpsoniD, Leor S. WeinbergeriD

Abstract

Fundamental to biological decision-making is the ability to generate bimodal expression patterns where two alternate expression states simultaneously exist. Here, we use a combination of single-cell analysis and mathematical modeling to examine the sources of bimodality in the transcriptional program controlling HIVs fate decision between active replication and viral latency. We find that the HIV Tat protein manipulates the intrinsic toggling of HIVs promoter, the LTR, to generate bimodal ON-OFF expression, and that transcriptional positive feedback from Tat shifts and expands the regime of LTR bimodality. This result holds for both minimal synthetic viral circuits and full-length virus. Strikingly, computational analysis indicates that the Tat circuits non-cooperative non-latching feedback architecture is optimized to slow the promoters toggling and generate bimodality by stochastic extinction of Tat. In contrast to the standard Poisson model, theory and experiment show that non-latching positive feedback substantially dampens the inverse noise-mean relationship to maintain stochastic bimodality despite increasing mean-expression levels. Given the rapid evolution of HIV, the presence of a circuit optimized to robustly generate bimodal expression appears consistent with the hypothesis that HIVs decision between active replication and latency provides a viral fitness advantage. More broadly, the results suggest that positive-feedback circuits may have evolved not only for signal amplification but also for robustly generating bimodality by decoupling expression fluctuations (noise) from mean expression levels.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
21
FWCI
1.12
Field percentile
top 23%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.