Molecular determinants of antagonist interactions with chemokine receptors CCR2 and CCR5
J. R. D. Dawson, G. M. Wadman, P. Zhang, A. J. Tebben, P. H. Carter, S. Gu, T. Shroka, L. Borrega-Roman, C. Salanga, T. M. Handel, I. Kufareva
Abstract
By driving monocyte chemotaxis, the chemokine receptor CCR2 shapes inflammatory responses and the formation of tumor microenvironments. This makes it a promising target in inflammation and immuno-oncology; however, despite extensive efforts, there are no FDA-approved CCR2-targeting therapeutics. Cited challenges include the redundancy of the chemokine system, suboptimal properties of compound candidates, and species differences that confound the translation of results from animals to humans. Structure-based drug design can rationalize and accelerate the discovery and optimization of CCR2 antagonists to address these challenges. The prerequisites for such efforts include an atomic-level understanding of the molecular determinants of action of existing antagonists. In this study, using molecular docking and artificial-intelligence-powered compound library screening, we uncover the structural principles of small molecule antagonism and selectivity towards CCR2 and its sister receptor CCR5. CCR2 orthosteric inhibitors are shown to universally occupy an inactive-state-specific tunnel between receptor helices 1 and 7; we also discover an unexpected role for an extra-helical groove accessible through this tunnel, suggesting its potential as a new targetable interface for CCR2 and CCR5 modulation. By contrast, only shape complementarity and limited helix 8 hydrogen bonding govern the binding of various chemotypes of allosteric antagonists. CCR2 residues S1012.63 and V2446.36 are implicated as determinants of CCR2/CCR5 and human/mouse orthosteric and allosteric antagonist selectivity, respectively, and the role of S1012.63 is corroborated through experimental gain-of-function mutagenesis. We establish a critical role of induced fit in antagonist recognition, reveal strong chemotype selectivity of existing structures, and demonstrate the high predictive potential of a new deep-learning-based compound scoring function. Finally, this study expands the available CCR2 structural landscape with computationally generated chemotype-specific models well-suited for structure-based antagonist design.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Structural basis for ligand modulation of the CCR2 conformational landscape
B. C. Taylor, C. T. Lee, R. E. Amaro·bioRxiv·Aug 14, 2018
- Structural basis for CCR6 modulation by allosteric antagonists
David Jon Wasilko, Brian S. Gerstenberger, … Huixian Wu·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Aug 31, 2024
- Crosslinking-guided geometry of a complete CXC receptor-chemokine complex and the basis of chemokine subfamily selectivity
T. Ngo, B. S. Stephens, … I. Kufareva·bioRxiv·Jan 10, 2020
- Rules of engagement: determinants of chemokine receptor activation and selectivity by CCL27 and CCL28
Mian Huang, Aura F. Celniker, … Tracy M. Handel·Journal of Biological ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Sep 19, 2025
- Noncanonical roles of chemokine regions in CCR9 activation revealed by structural modeling and mutational mapping
Inês Pinheiro, John R.D. Dawson, … Oliver Hartley·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Aug 18, 2025
- A fluorescent probe enables the discovery of improved antagonists targeting the intracellular allosteric site of the chemokine receptor CCR7
Silas L. Wurnig, Max E. Huber, … Finn K. Hansen·Journal of Medicinal ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Feb 12, 2025