Management of Mendelian Traits in Breeding Programs by Gene Editing: A Simulation Study
Abstract
BackgroundGenotypes based on high-density single nucleotide polymorphisms have recently been used to identify a number of novel recessive mutations that adversely affect fertility in dairy cattle as well as to track conditions such as polledness. The use of sequential mate allocation strategies that account for increases in genomic inbreeding and the economic impact of affected matings may result in faster allele frequency changes than strategies that do not consider inbreeding and monetary losses. However, the effect of gene editing on selection programs also should be considered because gene editing has the potential to dramatically change allele frequencies in livestock populations.\n\nMethodsA simulation program developed to evaluate dairy cattle breeding schemes was extended to include the use of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR), transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN), and zinc finger nuclease (ZFN) technologies for gene editing. A hypothetical technology with a perfect success rate was used to establish an upper limit on attainable progress, and a scenario with no editing served as a baseline for comparison.\n\nResultsThe technologies differed in the rate of success of gene editing as well as the success rate of embryo transfer based on literature estimates. The number of edited alleles was assumed to have no effect on success rate. The two scenarios evaluated considered only the horned locus or 12 recessive alleles that currently are segregating in the U.S. Holstein population. The top 1, 5, or 10% of bulls were edited each generation, and either no cows or the top 1% of cows were edited. Inefficient editing technologies produced less cumulative genetic gain and lower inbreeding than efficient ones. Gene editing was very effective at reducing the frequency of the horned haplotype (increasing the frequency of polled animals in the population), and allele frequencies of the 12 recessives segregating in the U.S. Holstein population decreased faster with editing than without.\n\nConclusionsGene editing can be an effective tool for reducing the rate of harmful alleles in a dairy cattle population even if only a small proportion of elite animals are modified.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 7
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Removal of alleles by genome editing -- RAGE against the deleterious load
Martin Johnsson, R. Chris Gaynor, … John M. Hickey·Genetics Selection EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Apr 17, 2019
- The genomes of precision edited cloned calves show no evidence for off-target events or increased de novo mutagenesis
Swati Jivanji, Chad Harland, … Götz Laible·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jun 17, 2021
- Base pair editing of goat embryos: nonsense codon introgression into FGF5 to improve cashmere yield
Guanwei Li, Shiwei Zhou, … Xiaolong Wang·bioRxiv·Jun 15, 2018
- Allele Sails: launching traits and fates into wild populations with DNA sequence modifiers
Michelle L Johnson, Bruce A. Hay, Maciej Maselko·bioRxiv·Mar 18, 2024
- Evidence that genome editing is preferable to transgenesis forenhancing animal traits
Jinhai Wang, Shinichi Nakagawa, … Diego Robledo·EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Jan 14, 2026
- Optimizing Genome Editing in Bovine Cells: A Comparative Study of Cas9 Variants and CRISPR Delivery Methods
Xiaofeng Du, Alexander Quinn, … Laercio R. Porto Neto·Biocatalysis and Agricultural BiotechnologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 9, 2025