Controlling for polygenic genetic confounding in epidemiologic association studies
Zijie ZhaoiD, Xiaoyu YangiD, Stephen DorniD, Jiacheng MiaoiD, Silvia BarcellosiD, Jason M. FletcheriD, Qiongshi LuiD
Abstract
Epidemiologic associations estimated from observational data are often confounded by genetics due to pervasive pleiotropy among complex traits. Many studies either neglect genetic confounding altogether or rely on adjusting for polygenic scores (PGS) in regression analysis. In this study, we unveil that the commonly employed PGS approach is inadequate for removing genetic confounding due to measurement error and model misspecification. To tackle this challenge, we introduce PENGUIN, a principled framework for polygenic genetic confounding control based on variance component estimation. In addition, we present extensions of this approach that can estimate genetically-unconfounded associations using GWAS summary statistics alone as input and between multiple generations of study samples. Through simulations, we demonstrate superior statistical properties of PENGUIN compared to the existing approaches. Applying our method to multiple population cohorts, we reveal and remove substantial genetic confounding in the associations of educational attainment with various complex traits and between parental and offspring education. Our results show that PENGUIN is an effective solution for genetic confounding control in observational data analysis with broad applications in future epidemiologic association studies.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Field percentile
- top 14%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genetic sensitivity analysis: adjusting for genetic confounding in epidemiological associations
Jean‐Baptiste Pingault, Frühling Vesta Rijsdijk, … Frank Dudbridge·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 11, 2021
- Observational epidemiological studies can mitigate genetic confounding with the genetic relatedness matrix
Roshni A. Patel, Joshua G. Schraiber, … Michael D. Edge·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·May 6, 2026
- Testing for differences in polygenic scores in the presence of confounding
Jennifer Blanc, Jeremy J. Berg·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2025
- Overcoming Attenuation Bias in Regressions using Polygenic Indices: A Comparison of Approaches
Hans van Kippersluis, Pietro Biroli, … Cornelius A. Rietveld·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2021
- Methodological Considerations When Using Polygenic Scores to Explore Parent-Offspring Genetic Nurturing Effects
Melisa Chuong, M.J. Adams, … Andrew Mark McIntosh·Wellcome Open ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 6, 2026
- Does standard adjustment for genomic population structure capture direct genetic effects?
Ramina Sotoudeh, Sam Trejo, … Dalton Conley·bioRxiv·May 3, 2024