Correction of the cytosine deamination artifacts in FFPE-based sequencing experiments
Wiktoria Płonka, Daria KostkaiD, Anna LalikiD, Monika KurpasiD, Khanh Ngoc DinhiD, Magdalena SitkiewicziD, Marek KimmeliD, Witold RzymaniD, Roman JaksikiD
Abstract
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues remain an essential resource for molecular studies, yet formalin-induced cytosine deamination introduces characteristic C>T/G>A artifacts that compromise the accuracy of next-generation sequencing (NGS) analyses. Numerous computational methods and enzymatic DNA repair strategies have been proposed to reduce these artifacts, but no systematic comparison across tools and experimental conditions exists. Here, we evaluate the performance of seven computational approaches (SOBDetector, Ideafix, MicroSEC, FFPolish, DeepOmics FFPE/FFPE-PLUS, FFPErase) together with the NEBNext(R) FFPE DNA Repair Mix v2, a multi-enzyme repair system applied during DNA preparation. Using three independent datasets, one based on whole genome sequencing (CGCI-BL) and two on whole exome sequencing (TCGA-PC and SUT-LUAD, the latter containing enzymatically repaired samples), and matched fresh-frozen samples as the gold standard, we assess precision, sensitivity, and artifact reduction efficiency across all methods. We further examine the potential synergy between enzymatic repair and post-sequencing computational filtering. Our results provide practical guidelines for FFPE artifact correction and demonstrate that enzymatic treatment provides the best results, while among the computational methods, FFPErase offers the most robust reduction of cytosine deamination artifacts while maximizing the retention of true somatic variants. KEY MESSAGESO_LIFormalin fixation in FFPE samples introduces artifacts that can significantly affect the accuracy of NGS analyses. C_LIO_LIAmong the evaluated approaches, enzymatic repair using NEBNext(R) FFPE DNA Repair Mix v2 achieves the most effective reduction of sequencing artifacts. C_LIO_LIComputational methods vary in performance, with FFPErase showing the most robust balance between artifact removal and retention of true somatic variants. C_LIO_LICombining enzymatic repair with computational filtering did not lead to consistent improvements in performance across datasets. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- FFPE DNA shows two major error profiles derived from deamination of cytosine and methylcytosine that can be mitigated using distinct repair strategies.
Lixin Chen, Minyong Chen, … Laurence M. Ettwiller·bioRxiv·Mar 2, 2023
- The mutational signatures of formalin fixation on the human genome
Qingli Guo, Eszter Lakatos, … Ville Mustonen·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 6, 2022
- Deep oncopanel sequencing reveals fixation time- and within block position-dependent quality degradation in FFPE processed samples
Y. Zhang, T. M. Blomquist, … J. Xu·bioRxiv·Apr 6, 2021
- Accurate somatic variant detection from formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissue (FFPE) derived WES and WGS by DeepOmicsFFPE-PLUS, a sequence context-based transformer
Wan Seop Kim, Ahwon Lee, … Dong-Hyuk Heo·bioRxiv·Feb 7, 2026
- Strand Orientation Bias Detector (SOBDetector) to remove FFPE sequencing artifacts
Miklós Dióssy, Zsófia M. Sztupinszki, … Zoltán Szállási·bioRxiv·Nov 28, 2019
- Comprehensive characterization of genomic, transcriptomic and epigenomic artifacts introduced in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues.
Erik J. Zmuda, Kyle R Covington, … Katherine A Hoadley·Cancer GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 6, 2017