Stablization of Interdomain Interactions in G protein αi Subunits Determines Gαi Subtype Signaling Specificity

Abstract

Highly homologous members of the Gi family, Gi1-3, have distinct tissue distributions and physiological functions, yet the functional properties of these proteins with respect to GDP/GTP binding and regulation of adenylate cyclase are very similar. We recently identified PDZ-RhoGEF (PRG) as a novel Gi1 effector, however, it is poorly activated by Gi2. Here, in a proteomic proximity labeling screen we observed a strong preference for Gi1 relative to Gi2 with respect to engagement of a broad range of potential targets. We investigated the mechanistic basis for this selectivity using PRG as a representative target. Substitution of either the helical domain (HD) from Gi1 into Gi2 or substitution of a single amino acid, A230 in Gi2 to the corresponding D in Gi1, largely rescues PRG activation and interactions with other Gi targets. Molecular dynamics simulations combined with Bayesian network models revealed that in the GTP bound state, dynamic separation at the HD-Ras-like domain (RLD) interface is prevalent in Gi2 relative to Gi1 and that mutation of A230s4h3.3 to D in Gi2 stabilizes HD-RLD interactions through formation of an ionic interaction with R145HD.11 in the HD. These interactions in turn modify the conformation of Switch III. These data support a model where D229s4h3.3 in Gi1 interacts with R144HD.11 stabilizes a network of interactions between HD and RLD to promote protein target recognition. The corresponding A230 in Gi2 is unable to form the "ionic lock" to stabilize this network leading to an overall lower efficacy with respect to target interactions. This study reveals distinct mechanistic properties that could underly differential biological and physiological consequences of activation of Gi1 or Gi2 by GPCRs.