Prediction and annotation of alternative transcription starts and promoter shift in the chicken genome
Valentina A. Grushina, Ivan YevshiniD, Oleg GuseviD, Fedor KolpakoviD, Станишевская Ольга ИгоревнаiD, Е. С. ФедороваiD, Natalia Anatolievna ZinovievaiD, Sergey S. Pintus
Abstract
The promoter shift is a long known phenomenon which implies changes in the coordinates of a transcription start site (TSS). Analysis of CAGE experiments allows one to assess the impact and statistical significance of the shift. The promoter shift can be associated not only with the change of stages in early development or tissue differentiation, but also with the environmental influence on the cells. Differential promoter usage suggests non-constitutive expression activity of the regulated gene, which, in turn, suggests the usage of few sharp promoters. On the other hand, the housekeeping genes are assumed to demonstrate stable levels of expression while using multiple broad promoters. Additionally, the housekeeping genes are assumed to be normally expressed in most of the tissues. Our results show that many ubiquitously expressed genes use single sharp promoters and are subject to the significant promoter shift, which implies an additional level of complexity to the problem of definition of a housekeeping gene. The reaction of genes in cells and tissues to external stimuli is often studied in the context of differential gene expression. Our study employs a different approach of differential promoter usage, which takes the genes whose promoters undergo significant promoter shifting as the signatures of tissue response and phenotypic effect. Our results suggest that the difference in growth rate of chickens is controlled by the rate of metabolism of nutrients via the differential usage of promoters of the relevant genes.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Field percentile
- top 41%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- TATA and paused promoters active in differentiated tissues have distinct expression characteristics
Vivekanandan Ramalingam, Malini Natarajan, … Julia Zeitlinger·Molecular Systems BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2021
- The Core Promoter has an active role in interpreting patterning information
Susnata Karmakar, Katherine Millen, Sarah J. Bray·bioRxiv·Oct 13, 2026
- Zebrafish embryonic tissue differentiation is marked by concurrent cell cycle dynamic and gene promoter regulatory changes
Joseph W. Wragg, Leonie Roos, … Ferenc Müller·bioRxiv·Dec 27, 2019
- Global regulatory transitions at core promoters demarcate the mammalian germline cycle
Nevena Cvetešić, Małgorzata Borkowska, … Boris Lenhard·bioRxiv·Oct 30, 2020
- The logic of native enhancer-promoter compatibility and cell-type-specific gene expression variation
Takeo Narita, Yoshiki Higashijima, … Chunaram Choudhary·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2022
- Core promoters restrict pleiotropic enhancer inputs to achieve spatiotemporal specificity in gene expression
Margarita Masoura, Deevitha Balasubramanian, … Yad Ghavi-Helm·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2025