Integrative spatial and multi-omic profiling in bladder cancer links L1 retrotransposition to extrachromosomal DNA, genomic instability, and viral mimicry response
Sophia J. PribusiD, Ivana OsredekiD, Jan Otoničar, Milena Simovic-LorenziD, Michael SchereriD, Sergio Manzano-SancheziD, Andreas KienzleiD, Urja ParekhiD, Vladimı́r BenešiD, Pooja SantiD, Jan‐Philipp MallmiD, Karsten Brand, Angelika Beate RiemeriD, Holger SültmanniD, Christoph PlassiD, Mladen StankovićiD, Jan O. KorbeliD, Tobias RauschiD, Aurélie ErnstiD
Abstract
Bladder cancer is one of the most frequent cancers and shows high recurrence rates. Despite recent advances, key knowledge gaps remain in understanding the molecular mechanisms of disease progression, which would support the development of early detection methods and effective personalized treatments. We apply integrated multi-omics and spatial analyses in a cohort of 49 bladder cancer patients to comprehensively profile genetic, epigenetic, transcriptomic, and spatial features of bladder cancer, alongside cell-free DNA blood analysis. Combining low-pass whole-genome cell-free DNA sequencing, Oxford Nanopore long-read tumor DNA sequencing, RNA-sequencing, and spatial transcriptomics, we provide insights into molecular alterations driving bladder cancer. We show frequent somatic LINE-1 (L1) insertions, with up to more than 500 insertions per tumor. We find that L1 insertions are active and occur early in bladder cancer development. We link aberrant somatic L1 insertion in bladder cancer with downstream genomic rearrangements and chromosomal instability, with an excess of structural variants and extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) in patients with particularly high L1 counts. By detecting ecDNA within tissue architecture using spatial transcriptomics, we identify the localization of ecDNA to distinct spatial clusters with differential expression of APOBEC3B and immune response pathways. These results, combined with replication timing analysis and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), offer evidence for the previously hypothesized viral mimicry response to L1 retrotransposition, mediated via APOBEC3B-editing, the cGAS-STING pathway, and RIG-I and MDA5 responses.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes reveals driver rearrangements promoted by LINE-1 retrotransposition in human tumours
Bernardo Rodríguez–Martín, Eva G. Álvarez, … the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Network·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2018
- Genomic and transcriptomic profiling of high-risk bladder cancer reveals diverse molecular and microenvironment ecosystems
Khyati A. Meghani, Yanni Yu, … Joshua J. Meeks·European UrologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 7, 2025
- The Origin of Bladder Cancer from Mucosal Field Effects
Jolanta E. Bondaruk, Roman Jaksik, … Bogdan A. Czerniak·iSciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 7, 2022
- Distinct clonal dynamics and interactions within the microenvironment near tumor stroma interfaces in rare histologic variants of bladder cancer
Luisa Quezada Ziesse, Sophia Bhalla, … Subhajyoti De·bioRxiv·Mar 24, 2026
- Mutational analysis of field cancerization in bladder cancer
T. Strandgaard, I. Nordentoft, … L. Dyrskjot·Bladder CancerPeer-reviewed·Jul 14, 2020
- Immune signatures correlate with L1 retrotransposition in gastrointestinal cancers
Hyunchul Jung, Jung Kyoon Choi, Eunjung Alice Lee·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2018