Genome ResearchGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
The genomic false shuffle: epigenetic maintenance of topological domains in the rearranged gibbon genome
Nathan H. LazariD, Kimberly A. NevoneniD, Brendan L. O’ConnelliD, Christine McCanniD, Rachel J. Waugh O'NeilliD, Richard Edward GreeniD, Thomas Joshua MeyeriD, Mariam OkhovatiD, Lucia CarboneiD
Abstract
The relationship between evolutionary genome remodeling and the three-dimensional structure of the genome remain largely unexplored. Here we use the heavily rearranged gibbon genome to examine how evolutionary chromosomal rearrangements impact genome-wide chromatin interactions, topologically associating domains (TADs), and their epigenetic landscape. We use high-resolution maps of gibbon-human breaks of synteny (BOS), apply Hi-C in gibbon, measure an array of epigenetic features, and perform cross-species comparisons. We find that gibbon rearrangements occur at TAD boundaries, independent of the parameters used to identify TADs. This overlap is supported by a remarkable genetic and epigenetic similarity between BOS and TAD boundaries, namely presence of CpG islands and SINE elements, and enrichment in CTCF and H3K4me3 binding. Cross-species comparisons reveal that regions orthologous to BOS also correspond with boundaries of large (400-600kb) TADs in human and other mammalian species. The co-localization of rearrangement breakpoints and TAD boundaries may be due to higher chromatin fragility at these locations and/or increased selective pressure against rearrangements that disrupt TAD integrity. We also examine the small portion of BOS that did not overlap with TAD boundaries and gave rise to novel TADs in the gibbon genome. We postulate that these new TADs generally lack deleterious consequences. Lastly, we show that limited epigenetic homogenization occurs across breakpoints, irrespective of their time of occurrence in the gibbon lineage. Overall, our findings demonstrate remarkable conservation of chromatin interactions and epigenetic landscape in gibbons, in spite of extensive genomic shuffling.
- organism: human
- organism: mouse
- assay: Hi-C
- assay: DNA methylation
- assay: ChIP-seq
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: spatial domain detection
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 107
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Sequence features do not drive karyotypic evolution: what are the missing correlates of genome evolution?
Thomas D. Brekke, Alexander S. T. Papadopulos, … John F. Mulley·bioRxiv·Aug 5, 2022
- Evolutionary stability of topologically associating domains is associated with conserved gene regulation
Jan Krefting, Miguel Angel Andrade-Navarro, Jonas Ibn-Salem·BMC BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 7, 2018
- Centromeric transposable elements and epigenetic status drive karyotypic variation in the eastern hoolock gibbon
Gabrielle A. Hartley, Mariam Okhovat, … Rachel J. Waugh O'Neill·Cell GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Mar 14, 2025
- 3D genome evolution and reorganization in the Drosophila melanogaster species group
Nicole S. Torosin, Aparna Anand, … Christopher E. Ellison·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 7, 2020
- Hi-C guided assemblies reveal conserved regulatory topologies on X and autosomes despite extensive genome shuffling
Gina Renschler, Gautier Richard, … Asifa Akhtar·Genes & DevelopmentPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2019
- LARGE-SCALE GENOMIC REORGANIZATIONS OF TOPOLOGICAL DOMAINS (TADs) AT THE HoxD LOCUS
Pierre J. Fabre, Marion Leleu, … Denis Duboule·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 7, 2017