bioRxivImmunologyPreprint
Effect of stimulation time on the expression of human macrophage polarization markers
D. Unuvar Purcu, A. Korkmaz, S. Gunalp, D. G. Helvaci, Y. Erdal, Y. Dogan, A. Suner, G. Wingender, D. Sag
Abstract
Macrophages are highly plastic cells that can polarize into functionally distinct subsets in vivo and in vitro in response to environmental signals. The development of protocols to model macrophage polarization in vitro greatly contributes to our understanding of macrophage biology. Macrophages are divided into two main groups: Pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages (classically activated) and anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages (alternatively activated), based on several key surface markers and the production of inflammatory mediators. However, the expression of these common macrophage polarization markers is greatly affected by the stimulation time used. Unfortunately, there is no consensus yet regarding the optimal stimulation times for particular macrophage polarization markers in in vitro experiments. This situation is problematic, (i) as analysing a particular marker at a suboptimal time point can lead to false-negative results, and (ii) as it clearly impedes the comparison of different studies. Using human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) in vitro, we analysed how the expression of the main polarization markers for M1 (CD64, CD86, CXCL9, CXCL10, HLA-DR, IDO1, IL1{beta}, IL12, TNF), M2a (CD200R, CD206, CCL17, CCL22, IL-10, TGM2), and M2c (CD163, IL-10, TGF{beta}) macrophages changes over time at mRNA and protein levels. Our data establish the most appropriate stimulation time for the analysis of the expression of human macrophage polarization markers in vitro. Providing such a reference guide will likely facilitate the investigation of macrophage polarization and its reproducibility.
- organism: human
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- assay: protein structure
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- In vitro and in vivo derived macrophages occupy distinct phenotypic states
Stéphane Chevrier, Vito RT Zanotelli, … Bernd Bodenmiller·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2025
- Stimulus-Response signaling dynamics characterize macrophage polarization states
Apeksha Singh, Supriya Sen, … Alexander Hoffmann·Cell SystemsPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2024
- Characterizing the polarization continuum of macrophage subtypes M1, M2a and M2c
T. C. Oates, P. L. Moura, … A. M. Toye·bioRxiv·Jun 13, 2022
- Dynamic Changes in Macrophage Polarization during the Resolution Phase of Periodontal Disease
J. Uttamani, V. Kulkarni, … A. Naqvi·bioRxiv·Feb 20, 2023
- A streamlined and comprehensive protocol for the generation and multi-omic analysis of human monocyte-derived macrophages
Olivia Palmer, Laurent Perreard, … Brittany A. Goods·BMC BiotechnologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 29, 2025
- Experimental control of macrophage pro-inflammatory dynamics using predictive models
L. D. Weinstock, J. E. Forsmo, … L. B. Wood·bioRxiv·Nov 1, 2019