Engineered Tn5 Variants Enhance CUT&Tag Fidelity for Transcription Factors
Lola PiperiD, Emma BairdiD, Harry J AshbaughiD, Olivia A. PentecostiD, Sara M. NowinskiiD, Derek H. JanssensiD
Abstract
The CUT&Tag method performs exceptionally well for profiling histone modifications, but mapping sequence-specific transcription factors (TFs) is complicated by intrinsic Tn5 activity at accessible DNA, and the high-salt washes used to suppress this activity can destabilize TF-chromatin interactions. We engineered the Tn5 DNA-binding channel to attenuate target-DNA engagement by replacing individual positively charged amino acids with neutral amino acids. We identified a "Goldilocks" variant (K160A) with intermediate attenuation that improved recovery of GATA2 motif-containing sites under low-salt CUT&Tag and KCl-based DynaTag conditions. A second variant (K249A) had improved performance for profiling CTCF over less accessible sites characterized by sharply focused short-fragment enrichment. By comparing the K160A and K249A variants, this TF-CUT&Tag assay provides a physical readout of the local chromatin environment at TF binding sites. Applying K160A TF-CUT&Tag to pluripotency-associated TFs in mouse embryonic stem cells increased recovery across their genomic binding landscapes while preserving factor-specific motif architectures. During skeletal muscle differentiation, TF-CUT&Tag improved recovery of MyoG and Pax7 occupancy relative to standard CUT&Tag, revealing strongly motif-enriched MyoG binding and a shift in Pax7 binding from CpG-rich promoters in progenitors toward Pax7 motif-enriched sites during differentiation. Together, these results show that TF-CUT&Tag captures distinct modes of TF-chromatin interaction, including motif-directed binding sites and more salt-sensitive sites that may depend on lower-affinity DNA recognition or protein-protein interactions and are difficult to predict from DNA sequence alone.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Efficient chromatin accessibility mapping in situ by nucleosome-tethered tagmentation
Steven Henikoff, Jorja G. Henikoff, … Kami Ahmad·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2020
- Discrepancies between ChIP-seq and CUT&Tag histone mark profiles are explained by GC content and chromatin accessibility
Eduardo Modolo, Lauren Patel, … Alon Goren·bioRxiv·Sep 26, 2026
- CUT&Tag for efficient epigenomic profiling of small samples and single cells
Hatice S Kaya-Okur, Steven J. Wu, … Steven Henikoff·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 29, 2019
- Neural network modeling of differential binding between wild-type and mutant CTCF reveals putative binding preferences for zinc fingers 1-2
Irene M. Kaplow, Abhimanyu Banerjee, Chuan-Sheng Foo·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Apr 11, 2022
- CUT&Tag Identifies Repetitive Genomic Loci that are Excluded from ChIP Assays
Brandon J Park, Shan Hua, … Patrick J. Murphy·bioRxiv·Feb 3, 2025
- Nascent CUT&Tag captures transcription factor binding after chromatin duplication
Matthew Wooten, Kevin Nguyen, … Steven Henikoff·bioRxiv·Oct 13, 2025