Sign in
GenomicsbioRxiv
Preprint

Engineered Tn5 Variants Enhance CUT&Tag Fidelity for Transcription Factors

Lola PiperiD, Emma BairdiD, Harry J AshbaughiD, Olivia A. PentecostiD, Sara M. NowinskiiD, Derek H. JanssensiD

Abstract

The CUT&Tag method performs exceptionally well for profiling histone modifications, but mapping sequence-specific transcription factors (TFs) is complicated by intrinsic Tn5 activity at accessible DNA, and the high-salt washes used to suppress this activity can destabilize TF-chromatin interactions. We engineered the Tn5 DNA-binding channel to attenuate target-DNA engagement by replacing individual positively charged amino acids with neutral amino acids. We identified a "Goldilocks" variant (K160A) with intermediate attenuation that improved recovery of GATA2 motif-containing sites under low-salt CUT&Tag and KCl-based DynaTag conditions. A second variant (K249A) had improved performance for profiling CTCF over less accessible sites characterized by sharply focused short-fragment enrichment. By comparing the K160A and K249A variants, this TF-CUT&Tag assay provides a physical readout of the local chromatin environment at TF binding sites. Applying K160A TF-CUT&Tag to pluripotency-associated TFs in mouse embryonic stem cells increased recovery across their genomic binding landscapes while preserving factor-specific motif architectures. During skeletal muscle differentiation, TF-CUT&Tag improved recovery of MyoG and Pax7 occupancy relative to standard CUT&Tag, revealing strongly motif-enriched MyoG binding and a shift in Pax7 binding from CpG-rich promoters in progenitors toward Pax7 motif-enriched sites during differentiation. Together, these results show that TF-CUT&Tag captures distinct modes of TF-chromatin interaction, including motif-directed binding sites and more salt-sensitive sites that may depend on lower-affinity DNA recognition or protein-protein interactions and are difficult to predict from DNA sequence alone.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.