bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Crowd-sourced benchmarking of single-sample tumour subclonal reconstruction
Adriana SalcedoiD, Maxime TarabichiiD, Alex Buchanan, Shadrielle M. G. EspirituiD, Hongjiu ZhangiD, Kaiyi ZhuiD, Tai-Hsien Ou YangiD, Ignaty LeshchineriD, Dimitris AnastassiouiD, Yuanfang GuaniD, Gun Ho JangiD, Kerstin HaaseiD, Amit G. DeshwariD, William Zou, Imaad Umar, Stefan C. DentroiD, Jeff A. WintersingeriD, Kami ChiottiiD, Jonas DemeulemeesteriD, Clemency JollyiD, Lesia Sycza, Minjeong KoiD, PCAWG-11 Working Group, SMC-Het Participants, David C. WedgeiD, , Paul Christopher BoutrosiD
Abstract
Tumours are dynamically evolving populations of cells. Subclonal reconstruction algorithms use bulk DNA sequencing data to quantify parameters of tumour evolution, allowing assessment of how cancers initiate, progress and respond to selective pressures. A plethora of subclonal reconstruction algorithms have been created, but their relative performance across the varying biological and technical features of real-world cancer genomic data is unclear. We therefore launched the ICGC-TCGA DREAM Somatic Mutation Calling -- Tumour Heterogeneity and Evolution Challenge. This seven-year community effort used cloud-computing to benchmark 31 containerized subclonal reconstruction algorithms on 51 simulated tumours. Each algorithm was scored for accuracy on seven independent tasks, leading to 12,061 total runs. Algorithm choice influenced performance significantly more than tumour features, but purity-adjusted read-depth, copy number state and read mappability were associated with performance of most algorithms on most tasks. No single algorithm was a top performer for all seven tasks and existing ensemble strategies were surprisingly unable to outperform the best individual methods, highlighting a key research need. All containerized methods, evaluation code and datasets are available to support further assessment of the determinants of subclonal reconstruction accuracy and development of improved methods to understand tumour evolution.
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Creating Standards for Evaluating Tumour Subclonal Reconstruction
DREAM SMC-Het Participants, Adriana Salcedo, … Paul Christopher Boutros·Nature BiotechnologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020
- Model-based tumor subclonal reconstruction
Giulio Caravagna, Timon Heide, … Andrea Sottoriva·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2020
- Quantifying the Influence of Mutation Detection on Tumour Subclonal Reconstruction
L. Y. Liu, V. Bhandari, … P. C. Boutros·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Dec 7, 2020
- Quantifying the seed sensitivity of cancer subclonal reconstruction algorithms
Philippa L. Steinberg, Lydia Liu, … Paul Christopher Boutros·bioRxiv·Feb 5, 2024
- SubClonal Hierarchy Inference from Somatic Mutations: automatic reconstruction of cancer evolutionary trees from multi-region next generation sequencing
Noushin Niknafs, Violeta Beleva Guthrie, … Rachel Karchin·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2015
- Reconstructing tumor evolutionary histories and clone trees in polynomial-time with SubMARine
Linda K. Sundermann, Jeff A. Wintersinger, … Quaid Morris·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 19, 2021