bioRxivMicrobiology
CRISPR-Cas systems are widespread accessory elements across bacterial and archaeal plasmids
R. Pinilla-Redondo, J. Russel, D. Mayo-Munoz, S. A. Shah, R. A. Garrett, J. Nesme, J. S. Madsen, P. C. Fineran, S. J. Soerensen
Abstract
Many prokaryotes encode CRISPR-Cas systems as immune protection against mobile genetic elements (MGEs), yet, a number of MGEs also harbor CRISPR-Cas components. With a few exceptions, CRISPR-Cas loci encoded on MGEs are uncharted and a comprehensive analysis of their distribution, prevalence, diversity, and function is lacking. Here, we systematically investigated CRISPR-Cas loci across the largest curated collection of natural bacterial and archaeal plasmids. CRISPR-Cas loci are widely but heterogeneously distributed across plasmids and, in comparison to host chromosomes, their mean prevalence per Mbp is higher and their distribution is markedly distinct. Furthermore, the spacer content of plasmid CRISPRs exhibits a strong targeting bias towards other plasmids, while chromosomal arrays are enriched with virus-targeting spacers. These contrasting targeting preferences dominate across the diversity of CRISPR-Cas subtypes and host taxa, highlighting the genetic independence of plasmids and suggesting a major role of CRISPR-Cas for mediating plasmid-plasmid conflicts. Altogether, CRISPR-Cas are frequent accessory components of many plasmids, which is an overlooked phenomenon that possibly facilitates their dissemination across microbiomes.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- organism: multiple species
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- research focus: chromatin & epigenetic regulation
- approach: comparative / phylogenetic analysis
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The CRISPR Spacer Space Is Dominated By Sequences From The Species-Specific Mobilome
S. A. Shmakov, V. Sitnik, … E. Koonin·bioRxiv·May 12, 2017
- Type IV CRISPR-Cas systems are highly diverse and involved in competition between plasmids
R. Pinilla-Redondo, D. Mayo-Munoz, … S. A. Shah·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2019
- CRISPR-Cas is beneficial in plasmid competition, but limited by competitor toxin-antitoxin activity when horizontally transferred
David Sünderhauf, Jahn R Ringger, … Stineke van Houte·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 19, 2026
- Co-occurrence of multiple CRISPRs and cas clusters suggests epistatic interactions
Aude G. Bernheim, David Bikard, … Eduardo P. C. Rocha·bioRxiv·Mar 30, 2019
- Planetary-scale metagenomic search reveals new patterns of CRISPR targeting
Simon Roux, Uri Neri, … Emiley A. Eloe‐Fadrosh·Nature MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 29, 2026
- CRISPR Spacers Acquired from Plasmids Primarily Target Backbone Genes, Making Them Valuable for Predicting Potential Hosts and Host Range
L. Androsiuk, S. Maane, S. Tal·bioRxiv·Dec 7, 2023