Enhanced detection of RNA modifications and mappability with high-accuracy nanopore RNA basecalling models
Gregor DiensthuberiD, Leszek P. PryszcziD, Laia LloveraiD, Morghan C. LucasiD, Anna Delgado-TejedoriD, Sonia CrucianiiD, Jean‐Yves RoignantiD, Oguzhan BegikiD, Eva Maria NovoaiD
Abstract
In recent years, nanopore direct RNA sequencing (DRS) has established itself as a valuable tool for studying the epitranscriptome, due to its ability to detect multiple modifications within the same full-length native RNA molecules. While RNA modifications can be identified in the form of systematic basecalling errors in DRS datasets, N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modifications produce relatively low errors compared to other RNA modifications, limiting the applicability of this approach to m6A sites that are modified at high stoichiometries. Here, we demonstrate that the use of alternative RNA basecalling models, trained with fully unmodified sequences, increases the error signal of m6A, leading to enhanced detection and improved sensitivity even at low stoichiometries. Moreover, we find that high-accuracy alternative RNA basecalling models can show up to 97% median basecalling accuracy, outperforming currently available RNA basecalling models, which show 91% median basecalling accuracy. Notably, the use of high-accuracy basecalling models is accompanied by a significant increase in the number of mapped reads -especially in shorter RNA fractions- and increased basecalling error signatures at pseudouridine ({Psi}) and N1-methylpseudouridine (m1{Psi}) modified sites. Overall, our work demonstrates that alternative RNA basecalling models can be used to improve the detection of RNA modifications, read mappability and basecalling accuracy in nanopore DRS datasets.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 4
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Systematic benchmarking of basecalling models for RNA modification detection with highly multiplexed nanopore sequencing
Gregor Diensthuber, Ivan Milenkovic, … Eva Maria Novoa·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Apr 7, 2026
- Evaluation of Nanopore direct RNA sequencing updates for modification detection
Neda Ghohabi Esfahani, Andrew J. Stein, … Miten Jain·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·May 7, 2026
- A Comparative Evaluation of Computational Models for RNA modification detection using Nanopore sequencing with RNA004 Chemistry
Yongji Zou, Mian Umair Ahsan, … Kai Wang·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2025
- Accurate detection and quantification of single-base m6A RNA modification using nanopore signals with multi-view deep learning
Jun Zhang, Jianbo Qiao, … Leyi Wei·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2025
- Calibrated analysis framework for nanopore direct RNA sequencing uncovers cell-specific m6A proportions at conserved sites
Denise Ohnezeit, Elene Loliashvili, … Angus C. Wilson·bioRxiv·Nov 2, 2025
- Accurate detection of m6A RNA modifications in native RNA sequences
Huanle Liu, Oguzhan Begik, … Eva Maria Novoa·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 9, 2019