Development and Assessment of a Sustainable PhD Internship Program Supporting Diverse Biomedical Career Outcomes
P. D. Brandt, D. Whittington, K. D. Wood, C. E. Holmquist, A. T. Nogueira, C. H. Gaines, P. J. Brennwald, R. L. Layton
Abstract
A doctoral-level internship program was developed at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with the intent to create customizable experiential learning opportunities for biomedical trainees to support career exploration, preparation, and transition into their post-graduate professional roles. We report the outcomes of this program over a five-year period. During that 5-year period, 123 internships took place at over 70 partner sites, representing at least 20 academic, for-profit, and non-profit career paths in the life sciences. A major goal of the program was to enhance trainees skill development and expertise in careers of interest. The benefits of the internship program for interns, host/employer, and supervisor/principal investigator were assessed using a mixed-methods approach, including surveys with closed- and open-ended responses as well as focus group interviews. Balancing stakeholder interests is key to creating a sustainable program with widespread support; hence, the level of support from internship hosts and faculty members were key metrics analyzed throughout. We hypothesized that once a successful internship program was implemented, faculty culture might shift to be more accepting of internships; indeed, the data quantifying faculty attitudes support this. Furthermore, host motivation and performance expectations of interns were compared with results achieved, and this data revealed both expected and surprising benefits to hosts. Data suggests a myriad of benefits for each stakeholder group, and themes are cataloged and discussed. Program outcomes, evaluation data, policies, resources, and best practices developed through the implementation of this program are shared to provide resources that facilitate the creation of similar internship programs at other institutions. Program development was initially spurred by National Institutes of Health pilot funding, thereafter, successfully transitioning from a grant-supported model, to an institutionally supported funding model to achieve long-term programmatic sustainability.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Becoming Biomedical Faculty: A Longitudinal Analysis of Successful Academic Career Aspirants Career Perspectives, Motivations, and Intentions
Remi F. Jones, Cilka Mayumi Hijara, … Richard McGee·bioRxiv·May 21, 2026
- From goal to outcome: analyzing the progression of biomedical sciences PhD careers in a longitudinal study using an expanded taxonomy
A. M. Brown, L. C. Meyers, … K. A. Petrie·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2023
- Integrating Career Development and Immigration Planning: A Pilot Program for International Scholars
Caroline Fecher, Natalie Chernets, Paola Cépeda·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2025
- Utilizing Mentorship Education to Promote a Culturally Responsive Research Training Environment in the Biomedical Sciences
S. Suiter, A. Byars-Winston, … L. Sealy·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2023
- Leadership in PhD (LeaP): a longitudinal leadership skill building program for underrepresented biomedical research trainees
M. D. Doles, J. Y. Kang, … J. D. Doles·bioRxiv·Sep 11, 2022
- TO BE OR NOT TO BE A PI: ADVICE FOR TRAINEES IN THE BIOMEDICAL/BASIC SCIENCES
Hei‐Yong G. Lo, Lily L. Nguyen, … Angeles B. Ribera·bioRxiv·Dec 9, 2025