Epigenetic state and gene expression remain stable after CRISPR/Cas-mediated chromosomal inversions
Solmaz KhosraviiD, Rebecca HinrichsiD, Michelle RönspiesiD, Reza HaghiiD, Holger PuchtaiD, Andreas HoubeniD
Abstract
In Arabidopsis thaliana, the chromosome arms are DNA-hypomethylated and enriched in the euchromatin-specific histone mark H3K4me3. In contrast, pericentromeric regions are DNA-hypermethylated and enriched in H3K9me2. In order to investigate how chromosomal location affects epigenetic stability and gene activity, we induced two differently-sized inversions by CRISPR/Cas and introduced heterochromatic, pericentric sequences into an euchromatic chromosomal arm. The epigenetic status of the lines was investigated by whole genome bisulfite sequencing and chromatin immunoprecipitation. Additionally, we studied the effect of the chromosomal inversions on gene expression. Our analysis revealed that both inversions affected neither the global distribution of eu- and heterochromatin-specific histone marks nor the global DNA methylation landscape. However, minor epigenetic changes were found across the entire genome. Importantly, the inverted chromosome regions and their border regions did not change their epigenetic profile. The transcription analysis of both inversion lines revealed that 0.5 - 1 % of genes were differentially expressed across the entire genome. However, the expression activity of those genes encoded by the inverted segments, and located around the cutting sites of CRISPR/Cas was less affected. Thus, gene expression levels and the epigenetic landscape remain preserved following engineered chromosomal restructuring, at least in the following generations.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 2.99
- Field percentile
- top 8%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Heterochromatin delays CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis but does not influence repair outcome
Kallimasioti Pazi, Keerthi T. Chathoth, … Andrew J. Wood·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 12, 2018
- Drastic differential CRISPR-Cas9 induced mutagenesis influenced by DNA methylation and chromatin features
T. Weiss, P. A. Crisp, … F. Zhang·bioRxiv·Feb 28, 2022
- Polymorphic Inverted Repeats near coding genes impact chromatin topology and phenotypic traits in Arabidopsis thaliana
A. L. Arce, R. Mencia, … P. A. Manavella·bioRxiv·Jul 5, 2022
- CRISPR-mediated centromere fission generates neo-chromosomes with distorted meiotic inheritance in Arabidopsis
Robin Burns, Terezie M. Mandáková, … Ian R. Henderson·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2026
- Key determinants of CRISPR/Cas9 induced inversions in tomato
Jillis Grubben, Gerard Bijsterbosch, … Henk J. Schouten·bioRxiv·Jan 9, 2024
- Chromatin context-dependent effects of epigenetic drugs on CRISPR-Cas9 editing
Ruben Schep, Max Trauernicht, … Bas van Steensel·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 19, 2024