Genetic Associations with Mathematics Tracking and Persistence in Secondary School
K. Paige HardeniD, Benjamin W. DomingueiD, Daniel W. BelskyiD, Jason D. BoardmaniD, Robert L. CrosnoeiD, Margherita MalanchiniiD, Michel Guillaume NivardiD, Elliot M. Tucker–DrobiD, Kathleen Mullan HarrisiD
Abstract
Maximizing the flow of students through the science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) pipeline is important to promoting human capital development and reducing economic inequality1. A critical juncture in the STEM pipeline is the highly-cumulative sequence of secondary school math courses2-5. Students from disadvantaged schools are less likely to complete advanced math courses, but debate continues about why6,7. Here, we address this question using student polygenic scores, which are DNA-based indicators of propensity to succeed in education8. We integrated genetic and official school transcript data from over 3,000 European-ancestry students from U.S. high schools. We used polygenic scores as a molecular tracer to understand how the flow of students through the high school math pipeline differs in socioeconomically advantaged versus disadvantaged schools. Students with higher education polygenic scores were tracked to more advanced math already at the beginning of high school and persisted in math for more years. Molecular tracer analyses revealed that the dynamics of the math pipeline differed by school advantage. Compared to disadvantaged schools, advantaged schools tracked more students with high polygenic scores into advanced math classes at the start of high school, and they buffered students with low polygenic scores from dropping out of math. Across all schools, even students with exceptional polygenic scores (top 2%) were unlikely to take the most advanced math classes, suggesting substantial room for improvement in the development of potential STEM talent. These results link new molecular genetic discoveries to a common target of educational-policy reforms.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 92
- FWCI
- 20.11
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Can education be personalised using pupils' genetic data?
Tim Morris, Neil M Davies, George Davey Smith·eLifePeer-reviewed·Mar 9, 2020
- Predicting educational achievement from genomic measures and socioeconomic status
Sophie von Stumm, Emily Smith‐Woolley, … Robert J. Plomin·Developmental SciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 23, 2019
- More Research Needed: There is a Robust Causal vs. Confounding Problem for Intelligence-associated Polygenic Scores in Context to Admixed American Populations.
Bryan J. Pesta, John G. R. Fuerst, … Emil O. W. Kirkegaard·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2020
- Genomics of Educational Attainment Across 80 Years of Social and Political Transformation in Germany
Deniz Fraemke, Anna Miller, … Laurel Raffington·bioRxiv·Sep 21, 2026
- Genetic effects on educational attainment in Hungary
Péter P. Ujma, Nóra Eszlári, … Gabriella Juhász·Brain and BehaviorPeer-reviewed·Nov 29, 2021
- Genetic advantage and equality of opportunity in education: Two definitions and an empirical application
Rita Dias Pereira·bioRxiv·Dec 14, 2021