Sign in
BioengineeringInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
Peer-reviewed journal article

Segmental outflow and trabecular meshwork stiffness in an ocular hypertensive mouse model

Cydney A. WongiD, A. Thomas ReadiD, Guorong LiiD, Amia Loveless, Nina Sara Fraticelli GuzmániD, Andrew FeolaiD, Todd SulchekiD, William Daniel StameriD, C. Ross EthieriD

Abstract

PurposeElevated intraocular pressure (IOP) due to increased outflow resistance through the trabecular meshwork (TM) is a major risk factor for primary open-angle glaucoma. Outflow through the TM is segmental, consisting of high flow (HF) and low flow (LF) regions. Here, we investigate how ocular hypertension impacts segmental outflow using a dexamethasone (DEX) mouse model and compare TM stiffness between HF and LF regions. MethodsNanoparticles containing DEX or vehicle were injected twice weekly in 2-4-month-old C57BL/6J mice (n=14), and IOP was measured weekly. At week 4, mouse eyes were perfused in vivo with fluorescent nanospheres to assess flow patterns and the circumferential percentage of high, intermediate, and low flow regions in each eye. Sagittal sections were collected from HF and LF regions, and atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to measure tissue stiffness. Immunofluorescent labeling was used to compare fibronectin and -SMA protein levels. ResultsDEX treatment significantly elevated IOP by an average of 33.3% and altered tracer distribution but not the percentage of HF and LF regions around the circumference. No significant differences in TM stiffness were detected between DEX-treated and control mice, or between HF and LF regions. Increased fibronectin in LF regions of DEX-treated eyes suggested subtle TM structural changes that were not detected by AFM. ConclusionsDexamethasone alters segmental flow distribution and may impact cell contractility rather than ECM stiffness to cause IOP elevation in young mice. These findings better characterize the nature of segmental outflow and TM mechanics in this model of steroid-induced glaucoma.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
Field percentile
top 46%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.