bioRxivBioengineeringPreprint
FRAGMENT MORPHOMETRY ANALYSIS AND SAME-COLOR-CHANNEL SEPARATION ENABLE OBJECTIVE QUANTIFICATION ACROSS BBB MODELS
Benjamin D PeckiD, Nicholas R. O’HareiD, Craig F. FerrisiD, Rebecca L. PinalsiD, Eno Essien EbongiD
Abstract
Quantifying blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity from fluorescence microscopy remains limited by subjective scoring and categorical classification methods that lack reproducibility. For objective and consistent BBB phenotyping, we present two semi-automated image-analysis pipelines that replace manual scoring with quantitative, continuous-variable measurements. Our in vitro pipeline, implemented in Python, quantifies the connectivity of tight junction structures by measuring discrete ZO-1 fragment objects within manually traced junction regions. It outputs continuous metrics including average fragment area, total junctional area, and a junctional fragmentation ratio that captures degree of ZO-1 continuity versus discontinuity. In human brain microvascular endothelial cells subjected to glycocalyx component knockdown, the pipeline detected significantly reduced fragment area (37% decrease for both CD44 and syndecan-1 (SDC1) knockdown, p = 0.0148 and 0.0084) and junctional fragmentation ratio (p = 0.0061 and 0.0137). Our in vivo pipeline integrates ilastik-based pixel classification with FIJI macro automation to quantify vascular marker colocalization and to separate vessel signal from microglial contamination within a single fluorescence channel, eliminating the need for dedicated counterstains. Applied across four mouse cohorts [young, aged, Alzheimers, traumatic brain injury (TBI)] and three brain regions [prefrontal cortex (PFC), hippocampus, midbrain], the pipeline revealed concurrent ZO-1 loss and ICAM-1 elevation in the PFC and hippocampus of aged and Alzheimers mice, with Alzheimers-specific doubling of eNOS occurring in the PFC (p = 0.0013). TBI mice showed persistent ZO-1 loss with transient ICAM-1 and eNOS changes. Both deterministic pipelines are available on GitHub and designed for adoption beyond the specific markers and systems analyzed here.
- organism: human
- organism: mouse
- assay: fluorescence / live-cell microscopy
- research focus: cell-cell communication
- research focus: clustering
- approach: deep learning
- approach: microscopy & imaging analysis
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Automated analysis of whole brain vasculature using machine learning
Mihail Ivilinov Todorov, Johannes Christian Paetzold, … Ali Ertürk·bioRxiv·Apr 18, 2019
- 3D quantification of zebrafish cerebrovascular architecture by automated image analysis of light sheet fluorescence microscopy datasets
Elisabeth Kugler, J. Frost, … P. A. Armitage·DevelopmentPeer-reviewed·Jan 10, 2022
- A validated quantitative method for the assessment of neuroprotective barrier impairment in neurodegenerative disease models
Vinod Kumar, John D. Lee, … Trent M. Woodruff·Journal of NeurochemistryPeer-reviewed·Jul 6, 2020
- Public volume electron microscopy data: An essential resource to study the brain microvasculature
Stephanie K. Bonney, Vanessa Coelho‐Santos, … Andy Y. Shih·Frontiers in Cell and Developmental BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 5, 2022
- Vessel Metrics: A python based software tool for automated analysis of vascular structure in confocal imaging
Sean D. McGarry, Cynthia Adjekukor, … Sarah J. Childs·bioRxiv·Dec 22, 2022
- BrainLine: An Open Pipeline for Connectivity Analysis of Heterogeneous Whole-Brain Fluorescence Volumes
T. Athey, M. Wright, … J. Vogelstein·bioRxiv·Feb 28, 2023