G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsMolecular BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Genetic background and mistranslation frequency determine the impact of mistranslating tRNASerUGG
Matthew D. BergiD, Yanrui Zhu, Raphaël Loll‐KrippleberiD, Bryan-Joseph San Luis, Julie L. Genereaux, Charles M. BooneiD, Judit VilléniD, Grant W. BrowniD, Christopher J. BrandliD
Abstract
Transfer RNA variants increase the frequency of mistranslation, the mis-incorporation of an amino acid not specified by the "standard" genetic code, to frequencies approaching 10% in yeast and bacteria. Cells cope with these variants by having multiple copies of each tRNA isodecoder and through pathways that deal with proteotoxic stress. In this study, we define the genetic interactions of the gene encoding tRNASerUGG,G26A, which mistranslates serine at proline codons. Using a collection of yeast temperature sensitive alleles, we identify negative synthetic genetic interactions between the mistranslating tRNA and 109 alleles representing 91 genes, with nearly half of the genes having roles in RNA processing or protein folding and turnover. By regulating tRNA expression, we then compare the strength of the negative genetic interaction for a subset of identified alleles under differing amounts of mistranslation. The frequency of mistranslation correlated with impact on cell growth for all strains analyzed; however, there were notable differences in the extent of the synthetic interaction at different frequencies of mistranslation depending on the genetic background. For many of the strains the extent of the negative interaction with tRNASerUGG,G26A was proportional to the frequency of mistranslation or only observed at intermediate or high frequencies. For others the synthetic interaction was approximately equivalent at all frequencies of mistranslation. As humans contain similar mistranslating tRNAs these results are important when analyzing the impact of tRNA variants on disease, where both the individuals genetic background and the expression of the mistranslating tRNA variant need to be considered.
- organism: yeast
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: genome assembly
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.24
- Field percentile
- 40th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The amino acid substitution affects cellular response to mistranslation
Matthew D. Berg, Yanrui Zhu, … Christopher J. Brandl·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 26, 2021
- A Novel Mistranslating tRNA Model in Drosophila melanogaster has Diverse, Sexually Dimorphic Effects
Joshua Isaacson, Matthew D. Berg, … Amanda J. Moehring·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 10, 2022
- Mistranslating tRNA identifies a deleterious S213P mutation in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae eco1-1 allele
Yanrui Zhu, Matthew D. Berg, … Christopher J. Brandl·Biochemistry and Cell BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 30, 2020
- Anticodon sequence determines the impact of mistranslating tRNAAla variants
Ecaterina Cozma, Megha Rao, … Matthew D. Berg·RNA BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 30, 2023
- Mistranslating tRNA variants impact the proteome and phosphoproteome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Matthew D. Berg, Alexis T. Chang, … Judit Villén·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 17, 2025
- Varied forms of mutant tRNA mistranslation produce distinct phenotypes across multiple model organisms
Brendan Charles, Amanda J. Moehring·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2026