Data-driven dynamic modelling identifies polyploidisation as key process in cell cycle progression upon DNA damage
Elsje J BurgersiD, Muriel M. HeldringiD, Lukas S. WijayaiD, Tamara Y DanilyukiD, Jiahang Su, Sebastiaan J Molenaar, Peter BouwmaniD, Sylvia E. Le DévédeciD, Bob van de WateriD, Joost B. BeltmaniD
Abstract
Chemotherapeutic agents often cause DNA damage in order to kill fast-dividing cancer cells or disrupt their proliferation. Therefore, understanding the interplay between DNA damage and cell cycle progression is highly relevant for understanding cancer cell behaviour. An important regulator is transcription factor p53, primarily known for its function to maintain genomic stability, regulate transient and permanent cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Activated p53 transcriptionally regulates the expression of many proteins, among which are MDM2, p21 and BTG2. MDM2 functions as a direct inhibitor of p53 by targeting it for ubiquitination. The proteins p21 and BTG2 are known for their regulatory function in G1 and G2 cell cycle arrest. Using HepG2-FUCCI cells, we showed that exposure to cisplatin or etoposide caused a temporary G2 arrest. To study the link between protein expression and cell cycle arrest, we developed a mathematical model in which we integrated a previously established model for the protein expression dynamics of p53, MDM2, p21 and BTG2 with a cell cycle model. This allowed us to determine the importance of p21 and BTG2 in their stimulation of G1 and G2 cell cycle arrest. We found that the protein dynamics could predict the G2 cell cycle arrest in exposed cells, but only in combination with endoreplication, i.e., the alternation of S and G phases without mitosis, resulting in polyploid cells. Our model predicted that the majority of cells endoreplicate upon exposure to high concentrations of cisplatin and most concentrations of etoposide, which we validated with additional time-lapse imaging data in which we could track individual cells. In conclusion, polyploidisation is a generic response of HepG2 cells after treatment with DNA-damaging compounds.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- p53-dependent polyploidisation after DNA damage in G2 phase
A. W. Middleton, R. Suman, … A. Lindqvist·bioRxiv·Jun 9, 2020
- Intricate Dynamical Cross-Talk Between p53 Protein and Cell Cycle Regulators Governs Mammalian Cell Fate
Kajal Charan, Sandip Kar·bioRxiv·Jun 10, 2026
- p53 pro-apoptotic activity is regulated by the G2/M promoting factor Cdk1 in response to DNA damage
Mireya Ruiz-Losada, Raul González, … Carlos Estella·bioRxiv·Feb 13, 2021
- Excessive E2F transcription in single cancer cells precludes transient cell cycle exit after DNA damage.
H. S. Segeren, L. M. van Rijnberk, … B. Westendorp·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2020
- DNA Damage Checkpoint Dynamics Drive Cell Cycle Phase Transitions
Hui Xiao Chao, Cere E. Poovey, … Jeremy E. Purvis·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2017
- An ATM/Wip1-dependent timer controls the minimal duration of a DNA-damage mediated cell cycle arrest
Himjyot Jaiswal, Jan Benada, … Arne Lindqvist·The EMBO JournalPeer-reviewed·Jun 12, 2017