Anesthesia is a Potent Determinant of Ultra-High Dose Rate Sparing in the Murine Total Abdominal Irradiation Model
Armin D. TavakkoliiD, William W. Daley, David I. HunteriD, Beverly A. Allen, Gretchen C. Carpenter, David J. GladstoneiD, Brian W. PogueiD, Paul Jack Hoopes
Abstract
Radiation therapy is a mainstay of treatment for numerous gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, where our ability to deliver dose to tumors is limited by acute GI toxicity. Ultra-high dose-rate (UHDR) FLASH irradiation can spare normal tissue, yet its dependence on physiological variables remains incompletely defined. We compared FLASH and conventional dose-rate (CDR) 9 MeV electron total abdominal irradiation (TAI) in C57BL/6 mice anesthetized with either intraperitoneal ketamine/xylazine or inhaled isoflurane in room air, deliberately omitting supplemental oxygen. Single doses of 14 or 16 Gy were delivered, and normal-tissue injury was quantified by time-to-25% body-weight loss. At 14 Gy, UHDR under K/X produced a marked survival advantage: by day 14, 80% of animals had not reached the weight-loss endpoint versus 40% after CDR K/X; no FLASH benefit was discernible with ISO anesthesia. Raising the dose to 16 Gy accentuated these trends; 40% of UHDR K/X mice were still below the endpoint at study termination, whereas all CDR K/X mice met it by day 7. Again, ISO abolished sparing at both dose rates. To probe mechanism, intraperitoneal oxygen tension was measured with an optical reporter in six mice. ISO anesthesia yielded significantly higher pO2 (62 {+/-} 4 mmHg) than K/X (26 {+/-} 10 mmHg), a 2.5-fold difference. These findings identify anesthetic-dependent oxygenation as a reproducible confounder in pre-clinical FLASH studies: elevated pO2 under ISO negates abdominal sparing, whereas K/X preserves it across two clinically relevant doses. Rigorous control and reporting of factors that alter tissue oxygenation are therefore essential when designing experiments and, ultimately, translating FLASH radiotherapy.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Field percentile
- top 35%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Anesthetic oxygen use and sex are critical factors in the FLASH sparing effect
A. D. Tavakkoli, M. A. Clark, … P. J. Hoopes·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2023
- Systematic tissue oxygen variation shows the modulation of murine skin radiation toxicity at ultra-high dose rates
David I. Hunter, Jacob P. Sunnerberg, … Brian W. Pogue·Physics in Medicine and BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 24, 2026
- Redefining FLASH RT: the impact of mean dose rate and dose per pulse in the gastrointestinal tract
Kevin Liu, Trey Waldrop, … Emil Schüler·International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*PhysicsPeer-reviewed·Apr 23, 2024
- Decreased Damage for proton FLASH vs Conventional Dose Rates in Mouse Jejunum Shown by Quantitative Assessment of γ-H2AX
Najah Curtis, Michele M. Kim, … Rodney D. Wiersma·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2026
- Hypoxic tumors are sensitive to FLASH radiotherapy
R. J. Leavitt, A. Almeida, … M.-C. Vozenin·bioRxiv·Nov 27, 2022
- Decrease in dose per fraction impairs the FLASH sparing effect in murine intestine model
Anouk Sesink, R. Geyer, … Veljko Grilj·Radiotherapy and OncologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 3, 2025