Sign in
GenomicsOncoImmunology
Peer-reviewed journal article

Driver mutations in GNAQ and GNA11 genes as potential targets for precision immunotherapy in uveal melanoma patients

Sandra García‐MuleroiD, Roberto Fornelino, Marco PuntaiD, Stefano LiseiD, Mar VarelaiD, L.P. del CarpioiD, Rafael MorenoiD, Marcel Costa-GarcíaiD, Dietmar RiederiD, Zlatko TrajanoskiiD, Alena GrosiD, Ramón AlemanyiD, Josep Maria PiulatsiD, Rebeca Sanz PamplonaiD

Abstract

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common ocular malignancy in adults. Nearly 95% of UM patients carry the mutually exclusive mutations in the homologous genes GNAQ (aminoacid change Q209L/Q209P) and GNA11 (aminoacid change Q209L). UM is located in an immunosuppressed organ and do not suffer immunoediting. Therefore, we hypothesize that driver mutations in GNAQ/11 genes could be recognized by the immune system. Genomic and transcriptomic data for primary uveal tumors was collected from TCGA-UM dataset (n=80). The immunogenic potential for GNAQ/GNA11 Q209L/Q209P mutations was assessed using a variety of tools and HLA types information. The immune microenvironment was characterized using gene expression data. All prediction tools showed stronger GNAQ/11 Q209L binding to HLA. The immunogenicity analysis revealed that Q209L is likely to be presented by more than 73% of individuals in 1000G database whereas Q209P is only predicted to be presented in 24% of individuals. GNAQ/11 Q209L showed higher likelihood to be presented by HLA-I molecules than almost all driver mutations analyzed. Samples carrying Q209L had a higher immune-reactive phenotype: (i) expression of antigen presenting genes HLA-A (p=0.009) and B2M (p=0.043); (ii) immunophenoscore (p=0.008); (iii) infiltration of immune system cells NK (p=0.002) and CD8+ T lymphocytes (p=0.02). Results suggest a high potential immunogenicity of the GNAQ/11 Q209L variant that could allow the generation of novel therapeutic tools to treat UM like neoantigen vaccinations.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
11
FWCI
2.65
Field percentile
top 10%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.