Sign in
BiochemistrybioRxiv
Preprint

Can we put Humpty Dumpty back together again? What does protein quantification mean in bottom-up proteomics?

D. L. Plubell, L. Käll, B.-J. Webb-Robertson, L. Bramer, A. Ives, N. L. Kelleher, L. M. Smith, T. J. Montine, C. C. Wu, M. J. MacCoss

Abstract

Bottom-up proteomics provides peptide measurements and has been invaluable for moving proteomics into large-scale analyses. In bottom-up proteomics, protein parsimony and protein inference derived from these measured peptides are important for determining which protein coding genes are present. However, given the complexity of RNA splicing processes, and how proteins can be modified post-translationally, it is overly simplistic to assume that all peptides that map to a singular protein coding gene will demonstrate the same quantitative response. Accordingly, by assuming all peptides from a protein coding sequence are representative of the same protein we may be missing out on detecting important biological differences. To better account for the complexity of the proteome we need to think of new or better ways of handling peptide data.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBludau '21Schork '22Ammar '25Malioutov '18Butenko '26Saadat '26
65% semantic matchSystems Biology
Isabell Bludau, Max Frank, Christian Dörig+7 more·Nature Communications·Jun 21, 2021· 88 citations