Changes in chromatin accessibility are not concordant with transcriptional changes for single-factor perturbations
Karun KianiiD, Eric M. SanfordiD, Yogesh GoyaliD, Arjun RajiD
Abstract
A major goal in the field of transcriptional regulation is the mapping of changes in the binding of transcription factors to the resultant changes in gene expression. Recently, methods for measuring chromatin accessibility have enabled us to measure changes in accessibility across the genome, which are thought to correspond to transcription factor binding events. In concert with RNA-sequencing, these data in principle enable such mappings; however, few studies have looked at their concordance over short duration treatments with specific perturbations. Here, we used tandem, bulk ATAC-seq and RNA-seq measurements from MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells to systematically evaluate the concordance between changes in accessibility and changes in expression in response to retinoic acid and TGF-{beta}. We found two classes of genes whose expression showed a significant change: those that showed some change in accessibility of nearby chromatin, and those that showed virtually no change despite strong changes in expression. The peaks associated with genes in the former group had a lower baseline accessibility prior to exposure to signal. Focusing the analysis specifically on peaks with motifs for transcription factors associated with retinoic acid and TGF-{beta} signaling did not reduce the lack of correspondence. Analysis of paired chromatin accessibility and gene expression data from distinct paths along the hematopoietic differentiation trajectory showed a much stronger correspondence, suggesting that the multifactorial biological processes associated with differentiation may lead to changes in chromatin accessibility that reflect rather than drive altered transcriptional status. Together, these results show many gene expression changes can happen independent of changes in accessibility of local chromatin in the context of a single-factor perturbation and suggest that some changes to accessibility changes may occur after changes to expression, rather than before.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 89
- FWCI
- 5.47
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- CTCF regulates global chromatin accessibility and transcription during rod photoreceptor development
Dahong Chen, Saumya Keremane, … Elissa P. Lei·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Feb 24, 2025
- Distinct Contribution of DNA Methylation and Histone Acetylation to the Genomic Occupancy of Transcription Factors
Martin Cusack, Hamish W. King, … Skirmantas Kriaučionis·bioRxiv·Jun 13, 2019
- Identification of determinants of differential chromatin accessibility through a massively parallel genome-integrated reporter assay
Jennifer Hammelman, Konstantin Krismer, … Richard I. Sherwood·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2020
- ChromatinHD connects single-cell DNA accessibility and conformation to gene expression through scale-adaptive machine learning
Wouter Saelens, Olga Pushkarev, Bart Deplancke·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 2, 2025
- Activation-induced re-organization of chromatin in human T cells
Naiara G. Bediaga, Hannah D. Coughlan, … Leonard C. Harrison·bioRxiv·Jun 8, 2020
- The role of chromatin accessibility in cis-regulatory evolution
P.-C. Peng, P. Khoueiry, … S. Sinha·bioRxiv·Oct 15, 2018