STAT1 -- p53 Dynamics Program Cell Fate through p21 and PUMA
M.K. Francis Didier TshianyiiD, Rebecca Walo OmanaiD, Apollinaire Ndondo Mboma, Kumwimba Seya DidieriD, Didier GonzeiD
Abstract
Signalling pathways tightly regulate stress-induced cell fate decisions, with p53 stabilization via attenuation of the p53-Mdm2 feedback being central to effective responses. Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 1 (STAT1) both represses Mdm2 transcription and co-activates p53 targets (p21 and PUMA), yet these dual roles have not been quantified within a unified framework. We build a mechanistic model that couples a biologically calibrated stress scale (S) and STAT1 activity ({Sigma}) to the canonical p53-Mdm2 core and to downstream p21 and PUMA modules. Key processes are not described by fixed parameters but by explicit functions of S, allowing the model to self-adjust across stress levels without manual re-fitting. This formulation ensures that oscillatory, damped, or plateau responses naturally emerge by varying S alone. STAT1 acts as a dynamical gain on the core (controlling mean level, pulse amplitude, and duration) and as a transcriptional co-activator scaling promoter strengths. Bifurcation analysis reveals a two-dimensional Hopf region in the (S, {Sigma}) plane; increasing {Sigma} shifts this region to higher S and progressively narrows it, ultimately quenching oscillations at large {Sigma} . Simulations of a generic cell with time-varying S and {Sigma}, combined with a two-stage decision rule (early transient detection followed by stationary readout), map p53 dynamics to fate: sustained moderate oscillations align with arrest, damped intermediate responses with senescence, and strongly damped high plateaus with apoptosis. The model reproduces cell fate distributions reported in literature for different cell lines (MCF-7, HCT116, U2OS) without kinetic parameter re-fitting, and highlights cell-type-specific sensitivity to p21 versus PUMA. Our framework identifies STAT1 as a tunable amplifier and oscillation quencher of the stress-responsive p53 network, providing testable dynamics-based predictions for fate control.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Intricate Dynamical Cross-Talk Between p53 Protein and Cell Cycle Regulators Governs Mammalian Cell Fate
Kajal Charan, Sandip Kar·bioRxiv·Jun 10, 2026
- Frequency switching between oscillatory homeostats and the regulation of p53
Peter Ruoff, Nobuaki Nishiyama·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·May 20, 2020
- Functional consequences of a p53-MDM2-p21 incoherent feedforward loop
Jamie Dean, Jose Reyes, … Franziska Michor A·bioRxiv·Jun 25, 2024
- Excitability in the p53 network mediates robust signaling with tunable activation thresholds in single cells
G. Moenke, E. Christiano, … A. Loewer·bioRxiv·Aug 9, 2016
- Dynamics of the p53 response to ionizing and ultraviolet radiation
Elizabeth A. Fedak, Frederick R. Adler, … Joshua D. Schiffman·bioRxiv·Jul 12, 2018
- Dynamical analysis of a model of BCL-2-dependent cellular decision making
Ielyaas Cloete, Tomás Alarcón·npj Systems Biology and ApplicationsPeer-reviewed·Nov 22, 2025