eLifeBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Predicting the effect of CRISPR-Cas9-based epigenome editing
Sanjit Singh BatraiD, Alan CabreraiD, Jeffrey P. SpenceiD, Jacob GoelliD, Selvalakshmi S AnandiD, Isaac B. HiltoniD, Yun S SongiD
Abstract
Epigenetic regulation orchestrates mammalian transcription, but functional links between them remain elusive. To tackle this problem, we use epigenomic and transcriptomic data from 13 ENCODE cell types to train machine learning models to predict gene expression from histone post-translational modifications (PTMs), achieving transcriptome-wide correlations of [~] 0.70 - 0.79 for most cell types. Our models recapitulate known associations between histone PTMs and expression patterns, including predicting that acetylation of histone subunit H3 lysine residue 27 (H3K27ac) near the transcription start site (TSS) significantly increases expression levels. To validate this prediction experimentally and investigate how natural vs. engineered deposition of H3K27ac might differentially affect expression, we apply the synthetic dCas9-p300 histone acetyltransferase system to 8 genes in the HEK293T cell line and to 5 genes in the K562 cell line. Further, to facilitate model building, we perform MNase-seq to map genome-wide nucleosome occupancy levels in HEK293T. We observe that our models perform well in accurately ranking relative fold-changes among genes in response to the dCas9-p300 system; however, their ability to rank fold-changes within individual genes is noticeably diminished compared to predicting expression across cell types from their native epigenetic signatures. Our findings highlight the need for more comprehensive genome-scale epigenome editing datasets, better understanding of the actual modifications made by epigenome editing tools, and improved causal models that transfer better from endogenous cellular measurements to perturbation experiments. Together these improvements would facilitate the ability to understand and predictably control the dynamic human epigenome with consequences for human health.
- organism: human
- assay: ChIP-seq
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 5
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Transgenic mice for in vivo epigenome editing with CRISPR-based systems
Matthew P. Gemberling, Keith Siklenka, … Charles A. Gersbach·bioRxiv·Mar 8, 2021
- Chromatin context-dependent effects of epigenetic drugs on CRISPR-Cas9 editing
Ruben Schep, Max Trauernicht, … Bas van Steensel·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 19, 2024
- Tailoring a CRISPR/Cas-based Epi-editor for Decreased Cytotoxicity and Enzymatic Specificity
Jacob Goell, Jing Li, … Isaac B. Hilton·bioRxiv·Sep 22, 2024
- Transgenic dCas9-DNMT3A mouse lines enable ex vivo and in vivo methylation editing with locus-dependent transcriptional effects
Maria Kalomoiri, Chiara Sorini, … Maja Jagodic·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2026
- Hierarchical Interplay between H3K27ac and H3K4me3 in Transcriptional Regulation
Chenwei Zhou, Chanjuan Dong, … Fu‐Sen Liang·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jun 22, 2026
- Machine learning methods for predicting guide RNA effects in CRISPR epigenome editing experiments
Wancen Mu, Tianyou Luo, … Yun Li·bioRxiv·Apr 18, 2024