bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Transgenic mice for in vivo epigenome editing with CRISPR-based systems
Matthew P. Gemberling, Keith SiklenkaiD, Erica RodrigueziD, Katherine R. Tonn EisingeriD, Alejandro BarreraiD, Fang LiuiD, Ariel Kantor, Liqing LiiD, Valentina CigliolaiD, Mariah F. HazlettiD, Courtney A. Williams, Luke C. BarteltiD, Victoria J. MadiganiD, Josephine C. Bodle, Heather DanielsiD, Douglas C. RouseiD, Isaac B. HiltoniD, Aravind AsokaniD, Maria CiofaniiD, Kenneth D. PossiD, Timothy E. ReddyiD, Anne E. WestiD, Charles A. GersbachiD
Abstract
The discovery, characterization, and adaptation of the RNA-guided clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-Cas9 system has greatly increased the ease with which genome and epigenome editing can be performed. Fusion of chromatin-modifying domains to the nuclease-deactivated form of Cas9 (dCas9) has enabled targeted gene activation or repression in both cultured cells and in vivo in animal models. However, delivery of the large dCas9 fusion proteins to target cell types and tissues is an obstacle to widespread adoption of these tools for in vivo studies. Here we describe the generation and validation of two conditional transgenic mouse lines for targeted gene regulation, Rosa26:LSL-dCas9-p300 for gene activation and Rosa26:LSL-dCas9-KRAB for gene repression. Using the dCas9p300 and dCas9KRAB transgenic mice we demonstrate activation or repression of genes in both the brain and liver in vivo, and T cells and fibroblasts ex vivo. We show gene regulation and targeted epigenetic modification with gRNAs targeting either transcriptional start sites (TSS) or distal enhancer elements, as well as corresponding changes to downstream phenotypes. These mouse lines are convenient and valuable tools for facile, temporally controlled, and tissue-restricted epigenome editing and manipulation of gene expression in vivo.
- Citations
- 3
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Generation and Validation of Versatile Inducible CRISPRi Embryonic Stem Cell and Mouse Models
Rui Li, Xianyou Xia, … Xudong Wu·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 30, 2020
- Transgenic dCas9-DNMT3A mouse lines enable ex vivo and in vivo methylation editing with locus-dependent transcriptional effects
Maria Kalomoiri, Chiara Sorini, … Maja Jagodic·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2026
- Interrogation of Enhancer Function by Enhanced CRISPR Epigenetic Editing
Kailong Li, Yuxuan Liu, … Jian Xu·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2019
- dCas allele sequestration (das-CRISPR): A Versatile New Method to Achieve Monoallelic Gene Editing in Mouse Embryos and in cell culture.
Ghassan Yehia, Jian Pan, … Peter J. Romanienko·bioRxiv·Jun 4, 2026
- Systematic comparison of dCas9-based DNA methylation epimodifiers over time indicates efficient on-target and widespread off-target effects
Majid Pahlevan Kakhki, Fatemeh Rangani, … M Jagodic·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 31, 2026
- Gene editing in rat embryonic stem cells to produce in vitro models and in vivo reporters
Yaoyao Chen, Sonia Olivia Spitzer, … Austin G Smith·Stem Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2017