bioRxivCell BiologyPreprint
Engineering Cell Fate: The Roles of iPSC Transcription Factors, Chemicals, Barriers and Enhancing Factors in Reprogramming and Transdifferentiation
Abstract
Direct reprogramming technology has emerged as an outstanding technique for the generation of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells and various specialized cells directly from somatic cells of different species. Recent studies dissecting the molecular mechanisms of reprogramming have methodologically improved the quality, ease and efficiency of reprogramming and eliminated the need for genome modifications with integrating viral vectors. With these advancements, direct reprogramming technology has moved closer to clinical application. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the cutting-edge findings regarding distinct barriers of reprogramming to pluripotency, strategies to enhance reprogramming efficiency, and chemical reprogramming as one of the non-integrating approaches in iPS cell generation. In addition to direct transdifferentiation, pluripotency factor-induced transdifferentiation or cell activation and signaling directed (CASD) lineage conversion is described as a robust strategy for the generation of both tissue-specific progenitors and clinically relevant cell types. Then, we consider the possibility that a combined method of inhibition of roadblocks (e.g. p53, p21, p57, Mbd3, etc.), and application of enhancing factors in a chemical reprogramming paradigm would be an almost safe, reliable and effective approach in pluripotent reprogramming and transdifferentiation. Furthermore, with respect to the state of native, aberrant, and target gene regulatory networks in reprogrammed cell populations, CellNet is reviewed as a computational platform capable of evaluating the fidelity of reprogramming methods and refining current engineering strategies. Ultimately, we conclude that a faithful, highly efficient and integration-free reprogramming paradigm would provide powerful tools for research studies, drug-based induced regeneration, cell transplantation therapies and other regenerative medicine purposes.
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- approach: experimental assay
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Defining reprogramming checkpoints from single-cell analysis of induced pluripotency
Khoa A. Tran, Stefan Pietrzak, … Rupa Sridharan·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2019
- A Dynamical Model for the Low Efficiency of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Reprogramming
Hussein Abdallah, Domitilla Del Vecchio, Yili Qian·bioRxiv·Oct 3, 2015
- High-Resolution Dissection of Conducive Reprogramming Trajectory to Ground State Pluripotency
Asaf Zviran, Nofar Mor, … Jacob H. Hanna·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2017
- Interrupted reprogramming into induced pluripotent stem cells does not rejuvenate human mesenchymal stromal cells
C. Goebel, R. Goetzke, … W. Wagner·bioRxiv·Jun 12, 2018
- Hic2 fast-tracks iPS cell generation by suppressing KLF4-dependent epidermal detour
Meryam Beniazza, Masahito Yoshihara, … Keisuke Kaji·bioRxiv·Sep 11, 2025
- Cellular reprogramming dynamics follow a simple one-dimensional reaction coordinate
Sai Teja Pusuluri, Alex H. Lang, … Horacio E. Castillo·bioRxiv·Jun 9, 2015