bioRxivImmunology
STING Licensing of Type I Dendritic Cells Potentiates Antitumor Immunity
J. Wang, S. Li, M. Wang, X. Wang, S. Chen, Z. Sun, X. Ren, G. Huang, B. D. Sumer, N. Yan, Y.-x. Fu, J. Gao
Abstract
Stimulator of interferon genes (STING) is an immune adaptor protein that senses cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) in response to self or microbial cytosolic DNA as a danger signal. STING is ubiquitously expressed in diverse cell populations including cancer cells with distinct cellular functions such as activation of type I interferons, autophagy induction, or triggering apoptosis. It is not well understood whether and which subsets of immune cells, stromal cells, or cancer cells are particularly important for STING-mediated antitumor immunity. Here using a polymeric STING-activating nanoparticle (PolySTING) with a "shock-and-lock" dual activation mechanism, we show type 1 conventional dendritic cell (cDC1) is essential for STING-mediated rejection of multiple established and metastatic murine tumors. STING status in the host but not in the cancer cells (Tmem173-/-) is important for antitumor efficacy. Specific depletion of cDC1 (Batf3-/-) or STING deficiency in cDC1 (XCR1creSTINGfl/fl) abolished PolySTING efficacy, whereas depletion of other myeloid cells had little effect. Adoptive transfer of wildtype cDC1 in Batf3-/- mice restored antitumor efficacy while transfer of cDC1 with STING or IRF3 deficiency failed to rescue. PolySTING induced a specific chemokine signature in wildtype but not Batf3-/- mice. Multiplexed immunohistochemistry analysis of STING-activating cDC1s in resected tumors correlates with patient survival while also showing increased expressions after neoadjuvant pembrolizumab therapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Therefore, we have defined that a subset of myeloid cells is essential for STING-mediated antitumor immunity with associated biomarkers for prognosis. One Sentence SummaryA "shock-and-lock" nanoparticle agonist induces direct STING signaling in type 1 conventional dendritic cells to drive antitumor immunity with defined biomarkers
- organism: mouse
- organism: human
- assay: proteomics
- assay: imaging
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: cell-cell communication
- approach: experimental assay
- approach: microscopy & imaging analysis
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Cellular selectivity of STING stimulation determines priming of tumor-specific T cell responses
B. Jneid, A. Bochnakian, … N. Manel·bioRxiv·Dec 1, 2021
- Context-dependent triggering of STING-interferon signaling by CD11b agonists supports anti-tumor immunity in mouse models and human cancer patients
X. Liu, G. D. Hogg, … D. DeNardo·bioRxiv·Mar 22, 2022
- STING agonists drive recruitment and intrinsic type I interferon responses in monocytic lineage cells for optimal anti-tumor immunity
Mélanie Girard, Tianning Yu, … Tania H. Watts·The Journal of ImmunologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 9, 2025
- Lipid nanoparticles delivering constitutively active STING mRNA as a novel anti-cancer therapeutic approach
W. Liu, M.-G. Alameh, … J. You·bioRxiv·Jan 8, 2022
- Synthetic STING agonists elicit powerful vaccine adjuvancy providing robust central memory and anti-tumour effects
L. D. Towner, L. N. Dahal, … S. A. Beers·bioRxiv·Jan 4, 2023
- Synergistic innate immune activation and anti-tumor immunity through combined STING and TLR4 stimulation
E. F. Higgs, T. F. Gajewski·bioRxiv·Apr 8, 2024