Mapping interactions between disordered regions reveals promiscuity in biomolecular condensate formation
Atar GilatiD, Alexander I. Alexandrov, Benjamin DubreuiliD, Emmanuel D. LevyiD
Abstract
Intrinsically-disordered regions (IDRs) promote intracellular phase separation and the formation of biomolecular condensates through interactions encoded in their primary sequence. While these condensates form spatially distinct assemblies in cells, it is unclear whether such specificity can be conferred by IDRs alone. Indeed, IDRs exhibit high conformational flexibility whereas specificity in protein recognition is generally associated with well-defined 3D structures. To characterize IDR-IDR interactions and assess their ability to mediate self-specific partitioning, we developed a synthetic system of Multivalent IDRs forming Constitutive DROPlets (micDROP). We investigated ten natural IDRs that underwent phase separation in micDROP. These IDRs exhibited a wide range of saturation concentrations in vivo, which correlated well with their total sequence stickiness. We then probed IDR-IDR specificity by co-expressing pairs of IDRs fused to homologous scaffolds that did not co-assemble. We observed a high degree of promiscuity, particularly among IDRs from the proteins Ddx4, DYRK3, ER, FUS, hnRNPA1, HspB8, RBM14 and TAF15, whereas TDP43 and UBQ2 formed spatially distinct condensates regardless of their partner. Further investigation revealed the short and conserved -helical segment of TDP43s IDR was governing its specific self-recognition. Our findings imply that IDRs can tune their phase separation propensity through sequence composition, while their formation of discrete condensates likely requires additional cellular or structural determinants. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/547715v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (60K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1bc6a1forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@db4325org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1154717org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ee619e_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 10.26
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Designed IDPs phase separate and mix or demix according to sequence designed parameters
Arjun Singh, Gregory L. Dignon·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2026
- Determinants of Disordered Protein Co-Assembly Into Discrete Condensed Phases
R. M. Welles, K. A. Sojitra, … M. C. Good·bioRxiv·Mar 10, 2023
- Quantifying (de)Mixing of Disordered Proteins in Molecular Dynamics Simulations
William Morton, Robert Vácha·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2026
- Asymmetric oligomerization state and sequence patterning can tune multiphase condensate miscibility
U. Rana, K. Xu, … C. P. Brangwynne·Nature ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Feb 21, 2024
- Decoding Condensate Composition Reveals Tunable Interactomes and Functions of Disordered Proteins
Qinyu Han, Yanghao Zhong, … Shasha Chong·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2025
- Balancing stability, dynamics and kinetics in phase separation of intrinsically disordered proteins
Guoqing Zhang, Xiakun Chu·The Journal of Chemical PhysicsPeer-reviewed·Sep 3, 2024