Biological PsychiatryGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Interaction between polygenic liability for schizophrenia and childhood adversity influences daily-life emotional dysregulation and psychosis proneness
Lotta-Katrin PriesiD, Boris KlingenbergiD, Claudia Menne‐LothmanniD, Jeroen DecosteriD, Ruud van WinkeliD, Dina CollipiD, Philippe DelespauliD, Marc De Hert, Catherine A DeromiD, Evert W. Thiery, Nele JacobsiD, Marieke WichersiD, Ozan CinariD, Bochao Danae LiniD, Jurjen Justin LuykxiD, Bart P. F. RutteniD, Jim van OsiD, Sinan GülöksüziD
Abstract
BackgroundThe earliest stages of the pluripotent psychopathology on the pathway to psychotic disorders is represented by emotional dysregulation and subtle psychosis expression, which can be measured using the Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA). However, it is not clear to what degree common genetic and environmental risk factors for psychosis contribute to variation in these early expressions of psychopathology.\n\nMethodsIn this largest ever EMA study of a general population twin cohort including 593 adolescents and young adults between the ages of 15 and 35 years, we tested whether polygenic risk score for schizophrenia (PRS-S) interacts with childhood adversity (the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire score) and daily-life stressors to influence momentary mental state domains (negative affect, positive affect, and subtle psychosis expression) and stress-sensitivity measures.\n\nResultsBoth childhood adversity and daily-life stressors were associated with increased negative affect, decreased positive affect, and increased subtle psychosis expression, while PRS-S was only associated with increased positive affect. No gene-environment correlation was detected. We have provided novel evidence for interaction effects between PRS-S and childhood adversity to influence momentary mental states [negative affect (b = 0.07, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.13, P = 0.013), positive affect (b = -0.05, 95% CI -0.10 to -0.00, P = 0.043), and subtle psychosis expression (b = 0.11, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.19, P = 0.007)] and stress-sensitivity measures.\n\nConclusionExposure to childhood adversities, particularly in individuals with high PRS-S, is pleiotropically associated with emotional dysregulation and psychosis proneness.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 54
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genetic overlap between schizophrenia and developmental psychopathology: a longitudinal approach applied to common childhood disorders between age 7 and 15 years
Michel G. Nivard, Suzanne H. Gage, … Christel M. Middeldorp·bioRxiv·May 11, 2016
- Using genetics to examine a general liability to childhood psychopathology
Lucy Riglin, Ajay K. Thapar, … Anita Thapar·Behavior GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 11, 2019
- Polygenic risk associations with developmental and mental health outcomes in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review
L.B. Moyakhe, Shareefa Dalvie, … Nastassja Koen·medRxiv·Mar 31, 2023
- Genome-wide analysis of adolescent psychotic experiences shows genetic overlap with psychiatric disorders
Oliver Pain, Frank Dudbridge, … Angelica Ronald·American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 31, 2018
- A common neural signature between genetic and environmental risk
Maria Vedechkina, Joni Holmes, … Duncan Edward Astle·bioRxiv·Jun 13, 2024
- Subthreshold psychosis symptoms associated with molecular genetic risk in a population-based cohort: Findings from Generation Scotland
Anna R. Docherty, Andrey A. Shabalin, … Kenneth S. Kendler·Schizophrenia BulletinPeer-reviewed·Mar 10, 2020